Banner Life Insurance Company v. Bonney et al
Filing
199
OPINION AND ORDER that Plaintiff serve the Suggestion of Death and the Second Amended Complaint on the Estate of Christopher W. Dyer within 20 days of the entry of this Order. Such service must be carried out in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. The Court will take Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss UNDER ADVISEMENT until the passage of the 90 day period provided for in Rule 25, or until the decedent's Estate files notice with the Court that it intends either to substitute a party on behalf of the decedent or not to pursue its potential claim against the Policy. Signed by District Judge Robert G. Doumar on 7/25/2012. Copy sent to all pro se parties as directed.(rsim, )
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
JUL 2 6 -;
Norfolk Division
BANNER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 2:1 Icvl98
JOHN W. BONNEY
as Administrator of
the ESTATE OF CLYDE B. PITCHFORD, JR., et al.,
Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is presently before the Court
upon Plaintiff Banner Life Insurance
Company's ("Plaintiff) Motion to Dismiss, filed June 25, 2012.
Plaintiff indicates that all
remaining persons having a purported interest in the proceeds of the life insurance policy of
Clyde B. Pitchford, Jr. at issue in this case have been properly served.
However, as Plaintiff
acknowledges, Defendant Christopher W. Dyer was deceased1 prior to service of Plaintiffs
Second Amended Complaint.
The decedent's wife, Phyllis Dyer, also a party to this litigation,
informed Plaintiffs counsel of her husband's death by notarized letter on March 27, 2012, which
Plaintiffs counsel filed with the Court on March 30, 2012. Plaintiff then filed the Suggestion on
Record of Party's Death on June 28, 2012.
Rule 25 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that, "If a party dies and the
claim is not extinguished ... [a] motion for substitution may be made by any party or by the
decedent's successor or representative. If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of
a statement noting the death, the action by or against the decedent must be dismissed." Fed. R.
Civ. P. 25(a)(l). There is no indication in the record that the Estate of Christopher W. Dyer has
According to the Suggestion on Record of Party's Death, Mr. Dyer died on March 17, 2012.
properly been served. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff serve the Suggestion of
Death and the Second Amended Complaint on the Estate of Christopher W. Dyer within 20 days
of the entry of this Order. Such service must be carried out in compliance with Federal Rule of
Civil Procedure 5. The Court will take Plaintiffs Motion to Dismiss UNDER ADVISEMENT
until the passage of the 90 day period provided for in Rule 25, or until the decedent's Estate files
notice with the Court that it intends either to substitute a party on behalf of the decedent or not to
pursue its potential claim against the Policy.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to all Counsel of Record
and pro se Parties.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Norfolk, Virginia
nt^
July /S2012
__________
Robert G. Dot
Senior United SttfMfij&fct Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?