Ramsey v. Runion
Filing
31
CLERK'S JUDGMENT. Signed by Clerk on 9/6/12 and mailed to all parties. (ldab, )
AO 450
Judgment
in
a
Civil Case
UNITED
STATES DISTRICT
EASTERN
DISTRICT OF
F|LED
VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
SEP -6 2012
clerk, u.s. district court
NORFOLK. VA
Charles Claude Ramsey,
Petitioner.
Case Number: 2:1 lcv(J0396
V.
Kimbcrly H. Runion
Director of the Virginia Center for Behavioral Rehabilitation
Respondents.
JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE
Decision by Court: This action came on for decision before the Court.
The issues have been decided and a decision has been rendered.
IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the petition (ECF No. 10) be DENIED AND
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for the reasons stated in the Report and modified herein.
Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) shall be GRANTED, and judgment shall be
entered in favor of Respondent. It is further ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Alter or
Amend Judgment (ECF No. 26) be DENIED. Respondent's Motion to Amend Her Objection
(ECF No. 28) be GRANTED, and Petitioner's Motion lo Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 27) be
DENIED. Petitioner may appeal from the judgment entered pursuant to this Opinion and Final
Order by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of this court. United States Courthouse.
600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510, within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of
judgment. Petitioner has failed to demonstrate "a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right." 2 8 U.S.C. ยง 2253(c)(2). Therefore, the court, pursuant lo Rule 22(b) of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, declines to issue a certificate of appealability, and it is hereby
ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Issuance ofa Certificate of Appealability (ECF No. 27)
be DENIED. See Miller-El v. Cockrcll, 537 U.S. 322, 335-36 (2003).
September 6. 2012
FERNANDO GAL1NDO, CLERK
Date
By:.
/s/
Lara Dabbene. Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?