McInnis v. BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP et al

Filing 12

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS ; granting 4 Motion to Dismiss; granting 8 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 11 Report and Recommendations. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 2/3/2012. (rsim)

Download PDF
FILED IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGIN^ FEB 3 2012 Norfolk Division CLtRK. U.S. DISTRICT COURT NOf-l-'Oi K. VA ORETHA B. MCINNIS, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:llcv468 BAC HOME LOAN SERVICING, LP, RECONTRUST COMPANY, N.A., and ALG TRUSTEE, L.L.C., as Substitute Trustee Defendants. ORDER Before the Court are Defendants' Motions to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). On October 5, 2011, this matter was referred to the Honorable United States Magistrate Judge Tommy E. Miller ("Magistrate Judge Miller") pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Section 636(b)(l)(B) and Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for a report and recommendation. On January 13,2012, Magistrate Judge Miller filed his report recommending that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss be GRANTED. By copy of the report, each party was advised of their right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge within 14 days from the date of the mailing of Magistrate Judge Miller's report. The Court has received no objections to the report and the time for filing the same has expired. The Court does hereby accept the findings and recommendations set forth in the report of Magistrate Judge Miller. Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. This case is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this final Order to counsel for both parties. IT IS SO ORDERED. Norfolk, Virginia February 2 ,2012 Raymond A. Jackson United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?