I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
101
MOTION to Seal Portions of Defendants' Brief in Support of their Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions and Exhibits K, L, M, and N to the Declaration of Emily O'Brien in Support Thereof by Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
I/P ENGINE, INC.
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512
AOL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
MOTION TO SEAL PORTIONS OF DEFENDANTS’ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR
MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS AND EXHIBITS K, L, M AND N TO THE DECLARATION OF
EMILY C. O’BRIEN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF
THEIR MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO SUPPLEMENT ITS INFRINGEMENT
CONTENTIONS
Pursuant to Local Rule 5 and the Agreed Protective Order entered by the Court [Dkt. No.
85], Defendants Google, Inc. and IAC Search & Media, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”),
respectfully move this Court for entry of the attached Order permitting Defendants to file under
seal Portions of Defendants’ Brief in Support of Their Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement
its Infringement Contentions (“Portions of Defendants’ Brief”) and Exhibits K, L, M and N to
the Declaration of Emily C. O’Brien in Support of Defendants’ Brief in Support of Their Motion
to Compel Plaintiff to Supplement its Infringement Contentions (“Certain Exhibits to O’Brien
Declaration”).
Grounds and authorities for this Motion are set forth in Defendants’
Memorandum in Support of Motion to Seal. In compliance with Local Rule 5, Defendants attach
a Proposed Agreed Order as Exhibit 1 and are filing separately a Public Notice of Defendants’
Motion to Seal. Defendants request that the Court retain sealed materials until forty-five (45)
days after a final order is entered and request that, unless the case is appealed, any sealed
materials be returned to counsel for the filing parties. The parties have agreed that confidential
materials should be filed under seal.
DATED: March 27, 2012
/s/ Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624.3000
Facsimile: (757) 624.3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
David Bilsker
David A. Perlson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com
davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com
Attorneys for Google Inc., Target Corporation,
IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Gannet Co., Inc.
2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on March 27, 2012, I will electronically file the foregoing with the
Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing (NEF) to
the following:
Jeffrey K. Sherwood
Kenneth W. Brothers
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 420-2200
Facsimile: (202) 420-2201
sherwoodj@dicksteinshapiro.com
brothersk@dicksteinshapiro.com
Donald C. Schultz
W. Ryan Snow
Steven Stancliff
CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 1500
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 623-3000
Facsimile: (757) 623-5735
dschultz@cwm-law.cm
wrsnow@cwm-law.com
sstancliff@cwm-law.com
Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc.
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624-3000
Facsimile: (757) 624-3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
Counsel for Google Inc.,
Target Corporation,
IAC Search & Media, Inc., and
Gannet Co., Inc.
3
/s/ Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624.3000
Facsimile: (757) 624.3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
11618745_1.DOC
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?