I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 1029

MOTION to Seal I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional Facts Justifying Its Request for Default Judgment in I/P Engine's Motion for Defendants to Show Cause Under Rule 37 for Non-Compliance with the August 13, 2013 Order and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine's Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION __________________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) AOL, INC. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) I/P ENGINE, INC., Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512 MOTION TO SEAL I/P ENGINE’S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM SETTING FORTH ADDITIONAL NEW FACTS JUSTIFYING ITS REQUEST FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN I/P ENGINE’S MOTION FOR DEFENDANTS TO SHOW CAUSE UNDER RULE 37 FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE AUGUST 13, 2013 ORDER AND THE DECLARATION OF CHARLES J. MONTERIO, JR. IN SUPPORT OF I/P ENGINE’S SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OF ADDITIONAL FACTS Pursuant to Local Rule 5 and the Agreed Protective Order entered by the Court [Dkt. No. 85], Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. (“I/P Engine”) respectfully moves this Court for entry of the attached Order permitting Plaintiff to file under seal its Supplemental Memorandum Setting Forth Additional New Facts Justifying Its Request For Default Judgment In I/P Engine’s Motion For Defendants To Show Cause Under Rule 37 For Noncompliance with the August 13, 2013 Order and the Declaration of Charles J. Monterio, Jr. in Support of I/P Engine’s Supplemental Memorandum of Additional Facts (collectively, “Supplemental Memorandum”). Grounds and authorities for this Motion are set forth in I/P Engine’s Memorandum in Support of Motion to Seal. In compliance with Local Rule 5, I/P Engine attaches a Proposed Agreed Order as Exhibit 1 and is filing separately a Public Notice of I/P Engine’s Motion to Seal. I/P Engine requests that the Court retain sealed materials until forty-five (45) days after a final order is entered and DSMDB-3202983 request that, unless the case is appealed, any sealed materials be returned to counsel for the filing parties. The parties have agreed that confidential materials should be filed under seal. Dated: October 31, 2013 By: /s/ Jeffrey K. Sherwood Donald C. Schultz (Virginia Bar No. 30531) W. Ryan Snow (Virginia Bar No. 47423) CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN PLC 150 West Main Street Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 623-3000 Facsimile: (757) 623-5735 Jeffrey K. Sherwood (Virginia Bar No. 19222) Frank C. Cimino, Jr. Kenneth W. Brothers Charles J. Monterio, Jr. DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. 2 DSMDB-3202983 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 31st day of October, 2013, the foregoing was served via the Court’s CM/ECF system, on the following: Stephen Edward Noona Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. 150 W Main St Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 senoona@kaufcan.com David Bilsker David Perlson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Robert L. Burns Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 robert.burns@finnegan.com Cortney S. Alexander Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 3500 SunTrust Plaza 303 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, GA 94111 cortney.alexander@finnegan.com /s/ Jeffrey K. Sherwood 3 DSMDB-3202983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?