I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 1051

NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 1049 MOTION to Seal Opposition to Defendants Opening Brief on Issues in the Courts August 14 Order and the Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D. in support of its Opposition (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION __________________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) AOL, INC. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) I/P ENGINE, INC., Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512 NOTICE OF MOTION TO SEAL I/P ENGINE, INC.’S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ OPENING BRIEF ON ISSUES RAISED IN THE COURT’S AUGUST 14 ORDER AND THE REBUTTAL DECLARATION OF DR. OPHIR FRIEDER, PH.D. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. (“I/P Engine”), pursuant to Rule 5 of the Local Rules of Practice for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, have moved the court for leave to file under seal its Opposition to Defendants’ Opening Brief on Issues in the Court’s August 14 Order and the Rebuttal Declaration of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D. in support of its Opposition (collectively, “Opposition”). Grounds and authorities for this Motion are set forth in I/P Engine’s Memorandum in Support of Motion to Seal. The afore-mentioned contains information marked as confidential by Defendants and, under the Protective Order (D.I. No. 85), should be filed under seal. The information contained in this Opposition contains Google’s proprietary and confidential information. Before this Court may seal Court documents, it must (1) provide public notice with an opportunity to object; (2) consider less drastic alternatives; and (3) state specific findings in support of a decision to seal and reject alternatives to sealing. See, e.g., Flexible Benefits DSMDB-3212383 Council v. Feldman, No. 1:08-CV-371, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93039 (E.D. Va. Nov 13, 2008) (citing Ashcroft v. Conoco, Inc., 218 F.3d 282, 288 (4th Cir. 2000)). In compliance with Local Rule 5 of the Rules of this Court, the Court posts the following notice to the public: “This serves as public notice that I/P Engine has moved to file under seal its Opposition. Objections to this Motion should be filed in the Civil Section of the Clerk’s Office. The Notice Of Motion To Seal I/P Engine, Inc.’s Opposition will be posted for a minimum of forty-eight (48) hours.” Dated: November 11, 2013 By: ___Jeffrey K. Sherwood________________ Donald C. Schultz (Virginia Bar No. 30531) W. Ryan Snow (Virginia Bar No. 47423) CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN PLC 150 West Main Street Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 623-3000 Facsimile: (757) 623-5735 Jeffrey K. Sherwood (Virginia Bar No. 19222) Frank C. Cimino, Jr. Kenneth W. Brothers Charles J. Monterio, Jr. DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. 2 DSMDB-3212383 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 11st day of November, 2013, the foregoing was served via the Court’s CM/ECF system, on the following: Stephen Edward Noona Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. 150 W Main St Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 senoona@kaufcan.com David Bilsker David Perlson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Robert L. Burns Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 robert.burns@finnegan.com Cortney S. Alexander Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 3500 SunTrust Plaza 303 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, GA 94111 cortney.alexander@finnegan.com /s/ Jeffrey K. Sherwood 3 DSMDB-3212383

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?