I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 1096

STIPULATION by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Noona, Stephen)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION

I/P ENGINE, INC.
Plaintiff,
v.

Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512

AOL INC., et al.,
Defendants.

STIPULATION
Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. (“I/P Engine”) and Counsel for Defendants AOL
Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, and Gannett Co., Inc.
(collectively “Defendants”) stipulate to the following:
1.

In its Orders of August 14, 2013, January 21, 2014, and January 28, 2014, this

Court awarded ongoing royalties against Defendants (the “Ongoing Royalty Award”). (Docket
Nos. 963, 1086 and 1088.)
2.

The parties have agreed to stay any proceeding to execute or enforce the payment

obligations of this judgment against Defendants for the Ongoing Royalty Award pending
resolution of the related pending appeals (Appeal Nos. 13-1307, 13-1313 and 14-1233, 14-1289),
and for thirty (30) days thereafter.
3.

This Stipulation does not and shall not represent any agreement by I/P Engine to

Defendants' requested stay of any requirement that Defendants provide revenue information and

calculations of ongoing royalty payments pending the appeals in this case (D.I. 1092), a stay that
I/P Engine opposes.
4.

The parties have also agreed that a supersedeas bond is not necessary to protect

I/P Engine’s interests pending Defendants’ appeal of this case.
5.

Consistent with Local Rule 62(B) for the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Virginia, the requirement of the posting of a supersedeas bond pending
Defendants’ appeal of this case is waived.
6.

This stipulation will terminate thirty (30) days after service of the issuance of a

mandate from the United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit, unless Defendants post a
supersedeas bond in an amount sufficient to cover the Ongoing Royalties Award amounts that
remain after appeal.
7.

Because Google is indemnifying the other Defendants for the Ongoing Royalties

Award, Google will satisfy in full any Ongoing Royalties Award amounts that remain after
appeal against all Defendants.
8.

This Stipulation represents the entire agreement of the parties to this action

regarding the matters set forth herein.
So stipulated:
Dated: April 11, 2014

By: /s/ Donald C. Schultz
Donald C. Schultz
Virginia State Bar No. 30531
W. Ryan Snow
Virginia State Bar No. 47423
CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN PLC
150 West Main Street
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Jeffrey K. Sherwood
Virginia State Bar No. 19222

01980.51928/5846546.2

2

Frank C. Cimino, Jr.
Kenneth W. Brothers
Charles J. Monterio, Jr.
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Dawn Rudenko Albert
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1633 Broadway
New York, NY 10019
Telephone:
[phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.
Dated: April 11, 2014

By: /s/ Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510-1665
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
David Perlson
David Bilsker
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-875-6600
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Counsel for Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC
Search and Media, Inc., Target Corporation and
Gannett Company, Inc.

DATED: April _____, 2014

SO ORDERED:
_______________________________________
Honorable Raymond A. Jackson

13103076v1
01980.51928/5846546.2

3