I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 1097

STIPULATION re 1096 Proposed Stipulation by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 4/11/14 and filed on 4/14/14. (tbro)

Download PDF
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA APR 14 2014 NORFOLK DIVISION Ctl ERK, U.S. PIS1HICI C;OI IRT N( VA I/P ENGINE, INC. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:1 l-cv-512 v. AOL INC., etcd., Defendants. STIPULATION Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. ("I/P Engine") and Counsel for Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, and Gannett Co., Inc. (collectively "Defendants") stipulate to the following: 1. In its Orders of August 14, 2013, January 21, 2014. and January 28, 2014, this Court awarded ongoing royalties against Defendants (the "Ongoing Royalty Award"). (Docket Nos. 963, 1086 and 1088.) 2. The parties have agreed to stay any proceeding to execute or enforce the payment obligations of this judgment against Defendants for the Ongoing Royalty Award pending resolution of the related pending appeals (Appeal Nos. 13-1307, 13-1313 and 14-1233, 14-1289), and for thirty (30) days thereafter. 3. This Stipulation does not and shall not represent any agreement by I/P Engine to Defendants' requested stay of any requirement that Defendants provide revenue information and i calculations of ongoing royalty payments pending the appeals in this case (D.I. 1092), a stay that I/P Engine opposes. 4. The parties have also agreed that a supersedeas bond is not necessary to protect I/P Engine's interests pending Defendants' appeal of this case. 5. Consistent with Local Rule 62(B) for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the requirement of the posting of a supersedeas bond pending Defendants' appeal of this case is waived. 6. This stipulation will terminate thirty (30) days after service of the issuance of a mandate from the United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit, unless Defendants post a supersedeas bond in an amount sufficient to cover the Ongoing Royalties Award amounts that remain after appeal. 7. Because Google is indemnifying the other Defendants for the Ongoing Royalties Award, Google will satisfy in full any Ongoing Royalties Award amounts that remain after appeal against all Defendants. 8. This Stipulation represents the entire agreement of the parties to this action regarding the matters set forth herein. So stipulated: Dated: April 11, 2014 By: /s/Donald C. Schultz Donald C. Schultz Virginia State Bar No. 30531 W. Ryan Snow Virginia State Bar No. 47423 CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN PLC 150 West Main Street Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: Facsimile: (757) 623-3000 (757) 623-5735 Jeffrey K. Sherwood Virginia State Bar No. 19222 01980.51928/5846546.2 2 Frank C. Cimino, Jr. Kenneth W. Brothers Charles J. Monterio, Jr. DICKSTEESf SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 Dawn Rudenko Albert DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1633 Broadway New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (212) 277-6715 Facsimile: (212) 277-6501 Counselfor Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. Dated: April 11, 2014 By: /s/Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510-1665 Telephone: (757) 624-3239 Facsimile: (757)624-3169 David Perlson David Bilsker QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 415-875-6600 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 Counsel for Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search and Media, Inc., Target Corporation and Gannett Company, Inc. DATED: April IL 2014 SO ORDERED: Raymond J^ Jackson United States District Judge Honorable Raymond A. Jackson 13103076vl 01980.51928/5846546.2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?