I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
STIPULATION re 1096 Proposed Stipulation by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 4/11/14 and filed on 4/14/14. (tbro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
U.S. PIS1HICI C;OI IRT
I/P ENGINE, INC.
Civil Action No. 2:1 l-cv-512
AOL INC., etcd.,
Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. ("I/P Engine") and Counsel for Defendants AOL
Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, and Gannett Co., Inc.
(collectively "Defendants") stipulate to the following:
In its Orders of August 14, 2013, January 21, 2014. and January 28, 2014, this
Court awarded ongoing royalties against Defendants (the "Ongoing Royalty Award"). (Docket
Nos. 963, 1086 and 1088.)
The parties have agreed to stay any proceeding to execute or enforce the payment
obligations of this judgment against Defendants for the Ongoing Royalty Award pending
resolution of the related pending appeals (Appeal Nos. 13-1307, 13-1313 and 14-1233, 14-1289),
and for thirty (30) days thereafter.
This Stipulation does not and shall not represent any agreement by I/P Engine to
Defendants' requested stay of any requirement that Defendants provide revenue information and
calculations of ongoing royalty payments pending the appeals in this case (D.I. 1092), a stay that
I/P Engine opposes.
The parties have also agreed that a supersedeas bond is not necessary to protect
I/P Engine's interests pending Defendants' appeal of this case.
Consistent with Local Rule 62(B) for the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Virginia, the requirement of the posting of a supersedeas bond pending
Defendants' appeal of this case is waived.
This stipulation will terminate thirty (30) days after service of the issuance of a
mandate from the United States Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit, unless Defendants post a
supersedeas bond in an amount sufficient to cover the Ongoing Royalties Award amounts that
remain after appeal.
Because Google is indemnifying the other Defendants for the Ongoing Royalties
Award, Google will satisfy in full any Ongoing Royalties Award amounts that remain after
appeal against all Defendants.
This Stipulation represents the entire agreement of the parties to this action
regarding the matters set forth herein.
Dated: April 11, 2014
/s/Donald C. Schultz
Donald C. Schultz
Virginia State Bar No. 30531
W. Ryan Snow
Virginia State Bar No. 47423
CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN PLC
150 West Main Street
Norfolk, VA 23510
Jeffrey K. Sherwood
Virginia State Bar No. 19222
Frank C. Cimino, Jr.
Kenneth W. Brothers
Charles J. Monterio, Jr.
DICKSTEESf SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Dawn Rudenko Albert
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
New York, NY 10019
Counselfor Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.
Dated: April 11, 2014
/s/Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510-1665
Telephone: (757) 624-3239
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
Counsel for Defendants AOL Inc., Google Inc., IAC
Search and Media, Inc., Target Corporation and
Gannett Company, Inc.
Raymond J^ Jackson
United States District Judge
Honorable Raymond A. Jackson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?