I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 130

ORDER granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion to Expedite; directing Google Inc. to file its responsive brief no later than 4/20/12; any related materials to be filed under seal shall be delivered to the Clerk for filing prior to 5:00 p.m. that day; plaintiff to file any rebuttal no later than 4/23/12; any related materials to be filed under seal shall be delivered to the Clerk for filing prior to 5:00 p.m. that day; directing the parties to schedule hearing on this motion as outlined; directing the parties to advise the Court promptly if a resolution is reached. (See Order for specifics.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller and filed on 4/13/12. (mwin, )

Download PDF
UNITED FOR THE STATES DISTRICT EASTERN DISTRICT COURT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division I/P ENGINE, INC., Plaintiff, v. AOL, Case INC., et No. 2:llcv512 al. , Defendants. ORDER Before 120) the Court filed by plaintiff plaintiff requests separately certain documents Federal Rules is compel 117), Inc., also of Civil Procedure, is due to be requests the defendant good cause GRANTED expedite in part Google any and response filed on April 26, respect the 2012. shorten this The The to a 2012. of the underlying The instant time period 18, expedite briefing DENIED in part. No. produce 6 (d) respond on or before April to to 11, Rule to (ECF 2012. Inc. filed on April 7(F)(1) the motion and 11, schedule with that the Court to shown, Rule briefing on April defendant Civil expedite For to Local motion to I/P Engine, to compel and direct motion (ECF No. motion to to a an expedited briefing filed motion Pursuant 120) is 2012. (ECF No. Court ORDERS the following: 1. any Defendant Google supporting documents materials to be Inc. no filed under shall file its later than April seal shall be responsive brief and 20, 2012. delivered to Any related the Clerk's

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?