I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
130
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 120 Motion to Expedite; directing Google Inc. to file its responsive brief no later than 4/20/12; any related materials to be filed under seal shall be delivered to the Clerk for filing prior to 5:00 p.m. that day; plaintiff to file any rebuttal no later than 4/23/12; any related materials to be filed under seal shall be delivered to the Clerk for filing prior to 5:00 p.m. that day; directing the parties to schedule hearing on this motion as outlined; directing the parties to advise the Court promptly if a resolution is reached. (See Order for specifics.) Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller and filed on 4/13/12. (mwin, )
UNITED
FOR THE
STATES
DISTRICT
EASTERN DISTRICT
COURT
OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division
I/P ENGINE,
INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
AOL,
Case
INC.,
et
No.
2:llcv512
al. ,
Defendants.
ORDER
Before
120)
the
Court
filed by plaintiff
plaintiff
requests
separately
certain
documents
Federal
Rules
is
compel
117),
Inc.,
also
of
Civil
Procedure,
is
due
to be
requests
the defendant
good cause
GRANTED
expedite
in part
Google
any
and
response
filed on April
26,
respect
the
2012.
shorten this
The
The
to a
2012.
of
the
underlying
The
instant
time period
18,
expedite briefing
DENIED in part.
No.
produce
6 (d)
respond on or before April
to
to
11,
Rule
to
(ECF
2012.
Inc.
filed on April
7(F)(1)
the motion
and
11,
schedule with
that the Court
to
shown,
Rule
briefing
on April
defendant
Civil
expedite
For
to
Local
motion
to
I/P Engine,
to
compel
and direct
motion
(ECF No.
motion to
to
a
an expedited briefing
filed motion
Pursuant
120)
is
2012.
(ECF No.
Court ORDERS
the
following:
1.
any
Defendant Google
supporting documents
materials
to be
Inc.
no
filed under
shall
file
its
later than April
seal
shall
be
responsive brief and
20,
2012.
delivered to
Any related
the Clerk's
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?