I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 191

Declaration re 190 Memorandum in Support of Jennifer Ghaussy in Support of Google and IAC Search's Motion for Rule 37 Sanctions for I/P Engine's Violation of May 2, 2012 Court Order by Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I)(Noona, Stephen)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION I/P ENGINE, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512 AOL, INC., et al., Defendants. DECLARATION OF JENNIFER GHAUSSY IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE AND IAC SEARCH’S MOTION FOR RULE 37 SANCTIONS FOR I/P ENGINE’S VIOLATION OF MAY 2, 2012 COURT ORDER I, Jennifer Ghaussy, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and am counsel for Defendants Google Inc. (“Google”) and IAC Search & Media, Inc. (“IAC Search”) in the above-captioned case. I provide this declaration upon personal knowledge and, if called upon as a witness, would testify competently as to the matters recited herein. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the parties’ stipulation of November 4, 2011. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of a letter from David Perlson to Charles Monterio dated February 13, 2012. 01980.51928/4856679.1 4. As of January 18, 2012, IAC Search produced almost 20,000 pages of documents regarding ASL and IAC Search’s use of AdSense for Search. This production, and Google’s December 7 production, included technical specifications, design requirements and other technical documentation. 5. On May 11, 2012, Google produced the custodial documents of Bryan Horling, who was listed in Google’s initial disclosures as a Google employee with knowledge of the accused features of Google Search, and by May 31, Google had produced the documents of the nine custodians agreed upon by the parties. 6. By June 15, 2012, IAC Search had completed its custodial production, including the documents of James Speer, listed in the initial disclosures as a person with knowledge of the accused features of Ask Sponsored Listings. 7. After correspondence and several meet and confers, Plaintiff agreed to supplement its November 2011 infringement contentions no later than February 17, 2012. On February 17, Plaintiff served its supplemental infringement contentions. These contentions included supplementations for Google AdWords and AdSense for Search, the other defendants’ use of AdSense for Search, and AOL Sponsored Listings. Plaintiff’s infringement contentions, however, did not include a supplementation for Google Search or IAC Search’s Ask Sponsored Listings as Plaintiff had agreed to provide. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of a letter from myself to Charles Monterio dated July 5, 2012. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of a letter from myself to Charles Monterio dated July 10, 2012. 01980.51928/4856679.1 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of an email from David Perlson to Charles Monterio dated July 10, 2012. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s First Liability Rule 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition of Defendant IAC Search and Media, Inc., dated April 2, 2012. 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s First Amended Liability Rule 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition of Defendant IAC Search and Media, Inc., dated June 12, 2012. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s First Liability Rule 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition of Defendant Google Inc., dated April 2, 2012. 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s First Amended Liability Rule 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition of Defendant Google Inc., dated June 12, 2012. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: July 13, 2012 Jennifer Ghaussy 01980.51928/4856679.1 DATED: July 13, 2012 /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624.3000 Facsimile: (757) 624.3169 senoona@kaufcan.com /s/ David A. Perlson David A. Perlson David Bilsker QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Counsel for GOOGLE INC. and IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC. 01980.51928/4856679.1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on July 13, 2012, I will electronically file the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing (NEF) to the following: Jeffrey K. Sherwood Kenneth W. Brothers DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 sherwoodj@dicksteinshapiro.com brothersk@dicksteinshapiro.com Donald C. Schultz W. Ryan Snow Steven Stancliff CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 1500 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 623-3000 Facsimile: (757) 623-5735 dschultz@cwm-law.cm wrsnow@cwm-law.com sstancliff@cwm-law.com Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc. Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 W. Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624-3239 Facsimile: (757) 624-3169 senoona@kaufcan.com Counsel for AOL Inc., Google, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc., Target Corporation and IAC Search & Media, Inc. 01980.51928/4856679.1 /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 W. Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624-3000 Facsimile: (757) 624-3169 senoona@kaufcan.com 11804429v1 01980.51928/4856679.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?