I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 193

ORDER GRANTING CONSENT 192 Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order with Respect to Expert Disclosure Dates. Entered 7/17/12 and filed 7/18/12. (Signed by Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman on 7/17/12). (Attachments: # 1 Letter) (ecav, )

Download PDF
Law Offices CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 1500 Norfolk, Virginia 23510 Telephone (757) 623-3000 Facsimile (757) 623-5735 July 17, 2012 W. Ryan Snow Email: wrsnow@cwm-law.com VIA HAND DELIVERY Hon. F. Bradford Stillman United States Magistrate Judge United States Distict Court Eastern District of Virginia 600 Granby Street Norfolk, Virginia 23510 Re: I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc., et al. Civil Action No. 2:1 l-cv-00512 Dear Judge Stillman: This firm represents plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. Please find enclosed for your review a fully endorsed Order Granting Consent Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order with Respect to Expert Disclosure Dates. An electronic version was filed yesterday as an attachment to Docket Item 192, styled Consent Motion and Memorandum in Support of Consent Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order with Respect to Expert Disclosure Dates. We respectfully request expedited entry of the Order if it is acceptable, as the first deadline proposed to be modified is this Wednesday, July 18, 2012. If you require additional information, please let us know. Very truly yours, W. Ryan ^afow WRS/ndf Enclosure cc: Donald C. Schultz, Esquire (electronic transmission) Stephen E. Noona, Esquire (electronic transmission) David Perlson, Esquire (electronic transmission) Robert L. Burns, Esquire (electronic transmission) Cortney S. Alexander, Esquire (electronic transmission) Jeffrey K. Sherwood, Esquire (electronic transmission) Kenneth W. Brothers, Esquire (electronic transmission) Frank C. Cimino, Jr., Esquire (electronic transmission) Charles J. Monterio, Esquire (electronic transmission)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?