I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 203

AGREED DISMISSAL ORDER AS TO CERTAIN CLAIMS. It is hereby ORDERED that (1) the patent infringement claims in this case as to Google Search and IAC's Ask Sponsored Listings are dismissed with prejudice; and (2) the Motion for Sanctions (D.I. 189) is withdrawn without prejudice to the right to renew the motion in the future. Entered and filed 8/6/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 8/6/12). (ecav, )

Download PDF
FILED UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA AUG NORFOLK DIVISION ■ 6 2012 CLERK, US DISTRICT COURT I/P ENGINE, INC. NORFOLK, VA Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 2:1 l-cv-512 v. AOL, INC., et al, Defendants. AGREED DISMISSAL ORDER AS TO CERTAIN CLAIMS THIS MATTER COMES to the Court on the stipulation of Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. ("I/P Engine") and Counsel for Defendants Google Inc. and IAC Search and Media, Inc. (collectively "Defendants") that: 1. I/P Engine and Defendants agree to dismiss with prejudice the patent infringement claims as to Google Search and IAC's Ask Sponsored Listings. For the avoidance of doubt, the patent infringement claims being dismissed explicitly exclude, and I/P Engine explicitly reserves and retains all rights and remedies with respect to, any and all other claims asserted in the present litigation including, without limitation, the patent infringement claims as to Google AdWords, Google AdSense for Search, Google AdSense for Mobile Search and AOL's Search Marketplace. 2. Defendants agree to withdraw their July 13, 2012 Motion for Sanctions (D.I. 189), without prejudice and without waiving the right to renew the motion in the future. Specifically, the parties agree that Defendants reserve their right to seek fees and costs relating to I/P Engine's assertion of claims against Google Search and Ask Sponsored Listings. Agreed Order as to Certain Claims Page 2 of 3 UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, and finding the stipulation acceptable, it is hereby ORDERED that (1) the patent infringement claims in this case as to Google Search and IAC's Ask Sponsored Listings are dismissed with prejudice; and (2) the Motion for Sanctions (D.I. 189) is withdrawn without prejudice to the right to renew the motion in the future. ENTERED this (i day of August 2012 Raymond AMackson Honorable Raymond A. Jackson WE ASK FOR THIS: A-6 Donald C. Schujii (Virginia Bar No. 30531) W. Ryan Snow (JVirginia Bar No. 47423) CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 1500 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: Facsimile: (757) 623-3000 (757)623-5735 Jeffrey K. Sherwood (Virginia Bar No. 19222) Frank C. Cimino, Jr. Kenneth W. Brothers Dawn Rudenko Albert Charles J. Monterio, Jr. DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 Counsel for PlaintiffI/P Engine, Inc. Agreed Order as to Certain Claims Page 3 of 3 WE ASK FOR THIS: foona (Virginia Bar No. 25367) & CANOLES, P.C. ain Street, Suite 2100 forfolk,VA 23510 Telephone: Facsimile: (757) 624-3239 (757)624-3169 David Perlson QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, C A 94111 Telephone: (415)875-6600 Facsimile: (415)875-6700 Counsel for Defendants Google Inc. and IAC Search & Media, Inc. SEEN WITHOUT OBJECTION: Virginia Bar No. 25367) TCANOLES, P.C. lain Street, Suite 2100 NteftrVA 23510 Telephone: Facsimile: (757)624-3239 (757)624-3169 Cortney S. Alexander FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 303 Peachtree Street NE Atlanta, GA 94111 Telephone: Facsimile: (404) 653-6400 (415)653-6444 Counsel for Defendant AOL, Inc. Agreed Order as to Certain Claims Page 4 of 4 SEEN WITHOUT OBJECTION: i (Virginia Bar No. 25367) f& CANOLES, P.C. i Street, Suite 2100 NjrfolkTVA 23510 Telephone: Facsimile: (757)624-3239 (757)624-3169 Counsel for Defendants Gannett Company, Inc. and Target Corporation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?