I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
203
AGREED DISMISSAL ORDER AS TO CERTAIN CLAIMS. It is hereby ORDERED that (1) the patent infringement claims in this case as to Google Search and IAC's Ask Sponsored Listings are dismissed with prejudice; and (2) the Motion for Sanctions (D.I. 189) is withdrawn without prejudice to the right to renew the motion in the future. Entered and filed 8/6/12. (Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson on 8/6/12). (ecav, )
FILED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
AUG
NORFOLK DIVISION
■ 6 2012
CLERK, US DISTRICT COURT
I/P ENGINE, INC.
NORFOLK, VA
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 2:1 l-cv-512
v.
AOL, INC., et al,
Defendants.
AGREED DISMISSAL ORDER AS TO CERTAIN CLAIMS
THIS MATTER COMES to the Court on the stipulation of Counsel for Plaintiff I/P
Engine, Inc. ("I/P Engine") and Counsel for Defendants Google Inc. and IAC Search and Media,
Inc. (collectively "Defendants") that:
1.
I/P
Engine
and
Defendants
agree
to
dismiss
with
prejudice
the
patent
infringement claims as to Google Search and IAC's Ask Sponsored Listings. For the avoidance
of doubt, the patent infringement claims being dismissed explicitly exclude, and I/P Engine
explicitly reserves and retains all rights and remedies with respect to, any and all other claims
asserted in the present litigation including, without limitation, the patent infringement claims as
to Google AdWords, Google AdSense for Search, Google AdSense for Mobile Search and
AOL's Search Marketplace.
2.
Defendants agree to withdraw their July 13, 2012 Motion for Sanctions (D.I.
189), without prejudice and without waiving the right to renew the motion in the future.
Specifically, the parties agree that Defendants reserve their right to seek fees and costs relating to
I/P Engine's assertion of claims against Google Search and Ask Sponsored Listings.
Agreed Order as to Certain Claims
Page 2 of 3
UPON CONSIDERATION THEREOF, and finding the stipulation acceptable, it is
hereby ORDERED that (1) the patent infringement claims in this case as to Google Search and
IAC's Ask Sponsored Listings are dismissed with prejudice; and (2) the Motion for Sanctions
(D.I. 189) is withdrawn without prejudice to the right to renew the motion in the future.
ENTERED this
(i
day of August 2012
Raymond AMackson
Honorable Raymond A. Jackson
WE ASK FOR THIS:
A-6
Donald C. Schujii (Virginia Bar No. 30531)
W. Ryan Snow (JVirginia Bar No. 47423)
CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 1500
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone:
Facsimile:
(757) 623-3000
(757)623-5735
Jeffrey K. Sherwood (Virginia Bar No. 19222)
Frank C. Cimino, Jr.
Kenneth W. Brothers
Dawn Rudenko Albert
Charles J. Monterio, Jr.
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone:
(202) 420-2200
Facsimile:
(202) 420-2201
Counsel for PlaintiffI/P Engine, Inc.
Agreed Order as to Certain Claims
Page 3 of 3
WE ASK FOR THIS:
foona (Virginia Bar No. 25367)
& CANOLES, P.C.
ain Street, Suite 2100
forfolk,VA 23510
Telephone:
Facsimile:
(757) 624-3239
(757)624-3169
David Perlson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, C A 94111
Telephone:
(415)875-6600
Facsimile:
(415)875-6700
Counsel for Defendants Google Inc. and IAC Search & Media, Inc.
SEEN WITHOUT OBJECTION:
Virginia Bar No. 25367)
TCANOLES, P.C.
lain Street, Suite 2100
NteftrVA 23510
Telephone:
Facsimile:
(757)624-3239
(757)624-3169
Cortney S. Alexander
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW,
GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
303 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 94111
Telephone:
Facsimile:
(404) 653-6400
(415)653-6444
Counsel for Defendant AOL, Inc.
Agreed Order as to Certain Claims
Page 4 of 4
SEEN WITHOUT OBJECTION:
i (Virginia Bar No. 25367)
f& CANOLES, P.C.
i Street, Suite 2100
NjrfolkTVA 23510
Telephone:
Facsimile:
(757)624-3239
(757)624-3169
Counsel for Defendants Gannett Company, Inc.
and Target Corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?