I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 230

Declaration re 229 Reply to Response to Motion of Emily C. O'Brien in Support of Google's Reply Brief in Support of its Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Produce Documents by Google Inc.. (Noona, Stephen)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION I/P ENGINE, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512 AOL, INC., et al., Defendants. DECLARATION OF EMILY C. O’BRIEN IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE'S REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS I, Emily C. O’Brien, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and am counsel for Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) in the above-captioned case. I provide this declaration upon personal knowledge and, if called upon as a witness, would testify competently as to the matters recited herein. 2. Several months ago, Plaintiff demanded the production of deposition and trial transcripts, expert reports, motions, orders, and other documents from prior litigations involving Google AdWords. Google explained that it would be unduly burdensome to collect and produce all of the documents demanded by Plaintiff, many of which were in the possession of outside counsel only. Plaintiff nonetheless insisted that, despite the burden, Google obtain certain documents from outside counsel and produce them. 3. Defendants issued document subpoenas to third parties Lycos, Altitude Capital Partners, and Eidos. Defendants successfully served these subpoenas on Lycos and Altitude Capital Partners, but was not able to successfully find Eidos for service. 4. On November 29, 2011, Defendants issued and served a document subpoena on Donald Kosak. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: September 4, 2012 Emily C. O'Brien 2 DATED: September 4, 2012 /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624.3000 Facsimile: (757) 624.3169 senoona@kaufcan.com David Bilsker David A. Perlson QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 4, 2012, I will electronically file the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing (NEF) to the following: Jeffrey K. Sherwood Kenneth W. Brothers DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 sherwoodj@dicksteinshapiro.com brothersk@dicksteinshapiro.com Donald C. Schultz W. Ryan Snow Steven Stancliff CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 1500 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 623-3000 Facsimile: (757) 623-5735 dschultz@cwm-law.cm wrsnow@cwm-law.com sstancliff@cwm-law.com Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc. Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624-3000 Facsimile: (757) 624-3169 senoona@kaufcan.com Counsel for Google Inc., Target Corporation, IAC Search & Media, Inc., AOL Inc. and Gannet Co., Inc. 4 Robert L. Burns FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 Telephone: (571) 203-2700 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 Courtney S. Alexander FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3500 SunTrust Plaza 303 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, GA 94111 Telephone: (404) 653-6400 Facsimile: (415) 653-6444 Counsel for Defendant AOL Inc. /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624.3000 Facsimile: (757) 624.3169 senoona@kaufcan.com 11910190v1 5

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?