I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 274

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge F. Bradford Stillman:Motion Hearing held on 9/18/2012 re 209 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff To Produce Documents filed by Google Inc., 200 MOTION for Sanctions Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Disclosed Prior Art filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. Present on behalf of the plaintiffs were Donald Schultz, Kenneth Brothers and Jeffrey Sherwood. Steve Noona and David Perlson were present on behalf of the defendants. Mr. Sherwood argued the motion for sanctions and Mr. Perlson responded. The Court made rulings on the record. The motion was DENIED. The parties then moved on to the motion to compel. The parties had previously resolved some of the issues in the motion. Mr. Perlson argued the motion and Mr. Sherwood responded. The Court made rulings on the record. The Court then inquired as to the pending motions to seal in the case. The parties were directed to submit to chambers an agreed order regarding the sealing of documents in the case by Monday, September 24, 2012 at noon. The Court will enter an order with regard to the two motions that were argued in open court. Court adjourned. (Court Reporter Gloria Smith, OCR.)(cdod, )

Civil Minutes
Time Set:
Start Time:
End Time:

12:00 p.m.
11:59 a.m.
1:06 p.m.

I/P Engine, Inc.

AOL Inc., et al.

09/18/2012
F. Bradford Stillman
Gloria Smith, OCR

Courtroom Deputy:

vs.

Date:
Presiding Judge:

) Government

2:11cv512

Court Reporter

( x ) Plaintiff (

Civil Case Number:

Cristi Dodge

Defendant(s)
Proceedings:

Matter came on for hearing on pending motions (#200) for sanctions and (#209) to
compel. Present were Donald Schultz, Jeffrey Sherwood, and Kenneth Brothers on
behalf of the plaintiffs. Steve Noona and David Perlson present on behalf of the defendants.
Mr. Sherwood argues the motion for sanctions and Mr. Perlson responds. The Court
makes rulings on the record. The motion is DENIED . The parties move on to the
motion to compel. The parties have previously resolved some of this issues in this
motion. Mr. Perlson argues the motion and Mr. Sherwood responds. The Court makes
rulings on the record.
The Court then inquires as to the pending motions to seal in this case. The parties are
directed to submit to chambers an agreed order regarding the sealing of documents in
the case by Monday, September 24, 2012 at noon.
The Court will enter an order with regard to the two motions that were argued in
open court.
Court adjourned.