I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
279
NOTICE by I/P Engine, Inc. re 278 Memorandum in Support,, of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, and 14 in support (Sherwood, Jeffrey)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
__________________________________________
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
AOL, INC. et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
I/P ENGINE, INC.,
Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512
NOTICE OF MOTION TO SEAL I/P ENGINE’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
SECOND MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS REGARDING UNTIMELY
DISCOVERY RESPONSES ALONG WITH EXHIBITS 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13 AND 14 IN
SUPPORT
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. (“I/P Engine”), pursuant to
Rule 5 of the Local Rules of Practice for the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, have moved the court for leave to file under seal its Memorandum in Support its
Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses along with
Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13 and 14 in support. Grounds and authorities for this Motion are set
forth in I/P Engine’s Memorandum in Support of Motion to Seal. The afore-mentioned contain
information marked as confidential by Defendants and, under the Protective Order (D.I. No. 85),
should be filed under seal. The information contained in these exhibits contain Google’s
proprietary and confidential information.
Before this Court may seal Court documents, it must (1) provide public notice with an
opportunity to object; (2) consider less drastic alternatives; and (3) state specific findings in
support of a decision to seal and reject alternatives to sealing. See, e.g., Flexible Benefits
DSMDB-3099619
Council v. Feldman, No. 1:08-CV-371, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93039 (E.D. Va. Nov 13, 2008)
(citing Ashcroft v. Conoco, Inc., 218 F.3d 282, 288 (4th Cir. 2000)).
In compliance with Local Rule 5 of the Rules of this Court, the Court posts the following
notice to the public: “This serves as public notice that I/P Engine has moved to file under seal its
Memorandum in Support its Second Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely
Discovery Responses along with Exhibits 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13 and 14 in support. Objections to this
Motion should be filed in the Civil Section of the Clerk’s Office. The Notice will be posted for a
minimum of forty-eight (48) hours.”
Dated: September 21, 2012
By: ___Jeffrey K. Sherwood________________
Donald C. Schultz (Virginia Bar No. 30531)
W. Ryan Snow (Virginia Bar No. 47423)
CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN PLC
150 West Main Street
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 623-3000
Facsimile: (757) 623-5735
Jeffrey K. Sherwood (Virginia Bar No. 19222)
Frank C. Cimino, Jr.
Kenneth W. Brothers
DeAnna Allen
Charles J. Monterio, Jr.
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 420-2200
Facsimile: (202) 420-2201
Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.
2
DSMDB-3099619
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on this 21st day of September, 2012, the foregoing NOTICE OF
MOTION TO SEAL I/P ENGINE’S MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF SECOND
MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS REGARDING UNTIMELY DISCOVERY
RESPONSES ALONG WITH EXHIBITS 2, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13 AND 14 IN SUPPORT, was
served via the Court’s CM/ECF system and via Hand Delivery, on the following:
Stephen Edward Noona
Kaufman & Canoles, P.C.
150 W Main St
Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
senoona@kaufcan.com
David Bilsker
David Perlson
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com
davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com
Robert L. Burns
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
Two Freedom Square
11955 Freedom Drive
Reston, VA 20190
robert.burns@finnegan.com
Cortney S. Alexander
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP
3500 SunTrust Plaza
303 Peachtree Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 94111
cortney.alexander@finnegan.com
/s/ Jeffrey K. Sherwood
3
DSMDB-3099619
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?