I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 282

MOTION for Sanctions Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Responses by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Sherwood, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION __________________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) AOL, INC. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) I/P ENGINE, INC., Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512 PLAINTIFF I/P ENGINE, INC.’S THIRD MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS REGARDING UNTIMELY DISCOVERY RESPONSES Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b) and 37(c)(1), Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. (“I/P Engine”) requests that this Court remedy the untimely and highly prejudicial discovery tactics employed by Defendant Google Inc. and strike (1) the more than 250 pages of source code that Google first made available on September 14, 2012, 10 days after the close of discovery, and (2) Google’s Supplemental Responses to I/P Engine’s Interrogatory Nos. 21 and 22, which reference that source code. For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s Third Motion for Discovery Sanctions Regarding Untimely Discovery Response, 1 striking these untimely discovery responses is the only meaningful remedy for Google’s violation of the discovery rules. Any other remedy (such as an extension of time) would reward Google for its dilatory tactics. Dated: September 21, 2012 By: /s/ Jeffrey K. Sherwood Donald C. Schultz (Virginia Bar No. 30531) W. Ryan Snow (Virginia Bar No. 47423) CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN PLC 150 West Main Street Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 623-3000 Facsimile: (757) 623-5735 Jeffrey K. Sherwood (Virginia Bar No. 19222) Frank C. Cimino, Jr. Kenneth W. Brothers Dawn Rudenko Albert Charles J. Monterio, Jr. DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street, NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 Counsel for Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc. 2 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD FAITH In accordance with Local Rule 37(E), I certify that counsel conferred in good faith to resolve this dispute prior to the filing of the present Motion. Counsel’s meet-and-confer efforts included correspondence and telephonic meet-and-confers. /s/ Charles J. Monterio, Jr. Charles J. Monterio, Jr. 3 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 21st day of September, 2012, the foregoing PLAINTIFF I/P ENGINE, INC.’S THIRD MOTION FOR DISCOVERY SANCTIONS REGARDING UNTIMELY DISCOVERY RESPONSES, was served via the Court’s CM/ECF system and via Hand Delivery, on the following: Stephen Edward Noona Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. 150 W Main St Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 senoona@kaufcan.com David Bilsker David Perlson Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Robert L. Burns Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 robert.burns@finnegan.com Cortney S. Alexander Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP 3500 SunTrust Plaza 303 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, GA 94111 cortney.alexander@finnegan.com /s/ Jeffrey K. Sherwood 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?