I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 323

Declaration re 319 MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Stephen L. Becker of Emily C. O'Brien by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17)(Noona, Stephen)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION I/P ENGINE, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512 AOL INC., et al., Defendants. DECLARATION OF EMILY C. O’BRIEN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY OF STEPHEN L. BECKER I, Emily C. O’Brien, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and am counsel for Defendants Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Gannett Co., Inc. and Target Corp. in the above-captioned case. I provide this declaration upon personal knowledge and, if called upon as a witness, would testify competently as to the matters recited herein. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of selected pages from the July 25, 2012 Expert Report of Stephen L. Becker, Ph.D. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Deposition Transcript of Stephen L. Becker, Ph.D., dated September 8, 2012. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of selected pages from the August 30, 2012 Report of Defendants' Expert Lyle H. Ungar, Ph.D. Concerning NonInfringement. 1 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of selected pages from the September 4, 2012 Updated Expert Report of Ophir Frieder. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of selected pages from the Deposition Transcript of Dr. Ophir Frieder, Ph.D., dated September 6, 2012. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of selected pages from the Deposition Transcript of Sanjay Datta, dated June 12, 2012. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of selected pages from the August 29, 2012 Rebuttal Expert Report of Keith R. Ugone, Ph.D. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by Google at bates number G-IPE-0867399. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by Google at bates number G-IPE-0867400. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by Google at bates numbers G-IPE-0218431-48. 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit 11 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by Google at bates number G-IPE-0867397. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit 12 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by Google at bates number G-IPE-0867398. 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit 13 is a true and correct copy of selected pages of a document produced by Google at bates numbers G-IPE-0484319-G-IPE-0484386. 15. Attached hereto as Exhibit 14 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by third party Yahoo! Inc. at bates numbers YAHOO-000035-YAHOO-000040. 2 16. Attached hereto as Exhibit 15 is a true and correct copy of a document produced by third party Yahoo! Inc. at bates numbers YAHOO-000147-YAHOO-000155. 17. Attached hereto as Exhibit 16 is a true and correct copy of the European Patent Office's Espacenet Bibliographic Data for US2006212447 (A1). 18. Attached hereto as Exhibit 17 is a true and correct copy of selected pages of the July 31, 2012 Deposition Transcript of Mark Blais, on behalf of Lycos. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: September 21, 2012 Emily C. O'Brien 3 DATED: September 21, 2012 /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624.3000 Facsimile: (757) 624.3169 senoona@kaufcan.com David Bilsker David A. Perlson QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Counsel for Google Inc., Target Corporation, IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Gannett Co., Inc. By: /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 W. Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624-3000 Facsimile: (757) 624-3169 Robert L. Burns FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 Telephone: (571) 203-2700 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 4 Cortney S. Alexander FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3500 SunTrust Plaza 303 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, GA 94111 Telephone: (404) 653-6400 Facsimile: (415) 653-6444 Counsel for Defendant AOL Inc. 5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 21, 2012, I will electronically file the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing (NEF) to the following: Jeffrey K. Sherwood Kenneth W. Brothers DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 sherwoodj@dicksteinshapiro.com brothersk@dicksteinshapiro.com Donald C. Schultz W. Ryan Snow Steven Stancliff CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 1500 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 623-3000 Facsimile: (757) 623-5735 dschultz@cwm-law.cm wrsnow@cwm-law.com sstancliff@cwm-law.com Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc. /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624.3000 Facsimile: (757) 624.3169 senoona@kaufcan.com 11939654v1 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?