I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
334
Memorandum in Support re 333 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
Page 1
1
Volume I
Pages 1 - 157
2
Exhibits 1 - 20
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
5
NORFOLK DIVISION
6
********************
7
I/P ENGINE, INC.,
8
9
10
*
Plaintiff,
*
Civil Action No.
Vs.
*
2:11-cv-512
AOL, INC., et al.,
*
11
Defendants.
*
12
********************
13
14
AUDIO/VISUAL DEPOSITION of LYCOS, INC.,
15
by and through its designee MARK BLAIS
16
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
17
Goulston & Storrs
18
50 Rowes Wharf, 7th Floor
19
Boston, Massachusetts
20
21
------ Jacqueline P. Shields, RPR, CSR ------
22
23
24
Job No. CS409539
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Page 147
1
question?
Sorry.
2
MS. O'BRIEN:
3
for me, I don't know if I can.
4
(Read back.)
5
6
7
A.
No.
Would you mind rereading it
I have no reason to believe one way or
the other.
Q.
Do you have any reason to believe that
8
Lycos wouldn't have licensed the patents in this
9
agreement for $3.2 million in 2004?
10
11
MS. ALBERT:
A.
Objection.
I have no reason.
Speculation.
What we would have done
12
in 2004, I mean, like I said, a lot of this was
13
internally driven.
14
different company back then, larger in all respects,
15
much bigger parent company, and just the overall
16
business forces would have been different.
17
largely driven by our lack of profitability at the
18
time, our need for some cash, things like that.
19
Circumstances being completely different, I have no
20
idea what we would have done back then.
21
22
Q.
We would have been a much
This was
And just to confirm, was Lycos profitable
in 2004?
23
A.
No.
24
Q.
Was Lycos profitable in 2005?
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?