I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 334

Memorandum in Support re 333 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
Page 1 1 Volume I Pages 1 - 157 2 Exhibits 1 - 20 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 5 NORFOLK DIVISION 6 ******************** 7 I/P ENGINE, INC., 8 9 10 * Plaintiff, * Civil Action No. Vs. * 2:11-cv-512 AOL, INC., et al., * 11 Defendants. * 12 ******************** 13 14 AUDIO/VISUAL DEPOSITION of LYCOS, INC., 15 by and through its designee MARK BLAIS 16 Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. 17 Goulston & Storrs 18 50 Rowes Wharf, 7th Floor 19 Boston, Massachusetts 20 21 ------ Jacqueline P. Shields, RPR, CSR ------ 22 23 24 Job No. CS409539 Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 Page 147 1 question? Sorry. 2 MS. O'BRIEN: 3 for me, I don't know if I can. 4 (Read back.) 5 6 7 A. No. Would you mind rereading it I have no reason to believe one way or the other. Q. Do you have any reason to believe that 8 Lycos wouldn't have licensed the patents in this 9 agreement for $3.2 million in 2004? 10 11 MS. ALBERT: A. Objection. I have no reason. Speculation. What we would have done 12 in 2004, I mean, like I said, a lot of this was 13 internally driven. 14 different company back then, larger in all respects, 15 much bigger parent company, and just the overall 16 business forces would have been different. 17 largely driven by our lack of profitability at the 18 time, our need for some cash, things like that. 19 Circumstances being completely different, I have no 20 idea what we would have done back then. 21 22 Q. We would have been a much This was And just to confirm, was Lycos profitable in 2004? 23 A. No. 24 Q. Was Lycos profitable in 2005? Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?