I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 334

Memorandum in Support re 333 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION __________________________________________ ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) AOL, INC. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) __________________________________________) I/P ENGINE, INC., Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF I/P ENGINE, INC.’S SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE TO PRECLUDE NON-COMPARABLE LICENSE AGREEMENTS This Court, having considered Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s Second Motion In Limine and accompanying Memorandum in Support thereof, and finding good cause exists, hereby ORDERS that the motion is GRANTED as follows: The Court hereby precludes any testimony or other evidence of agreements or licenses that Google’s expert has included in his expert report that are not comparable licenses and any licenses between Google and other third parties that Google’s expert has included in his expert report solely to support his speculation that Google only enters into lump sum agreements. Precluded agreements hereby include DEX # 14, 15, 26 and 111-119 (discussed in further detail in the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s Second Motion In Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements). So Ordered: Dated: September __, 2012 _________________________________ United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia DSMDB-3099943

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?