I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
334
Memorandum in Support re 333 MOTION in Limine Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Second Motion in Limine to Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Proposed Order)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
__________________________________________
)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
AOL, INC. et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
__________________________________________)
I/P ENGINE, INC.,
Civ. Action No. 2:11-cv-512
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF I/P ENGINE, INC.’S
SECOND MOTION IN LIMINE
TO PRECLUDE NON-COMPARABLE LICENSE AGREEMENTS
This Court, having considered Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s Second Motion In Limine and
accompanying Memorandum in Support thereof, and finding good cause exists, hereby
ORDERS that the motion is GRANTED as follows:
The Court hereby precludes any testimony or other evidence of agreements or licenses
that Google’s expert has included in his expert report that are not comparable licenses and any
licenses between Google and other third parties that Google’s expert has included in his expert
report solely to support his speculation that Google only enters into lump sum agreements.
Precluded agreements hereby include DEX # 14, 15, 26 and 111-119 (discussed in further detail
in the Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.’s Second Motion In Limine to
Preclude Non-Comparable License Agreements).
So Ordered:
Dated: September __, 2012
_________________________________
United States District Court
Eastern District of Virginia
DSMDB-3099943
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?