I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
438
Declaration re 433 Opposition, 432 Opposition, 434 Opposition, of Margaret P. Kammerud in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions in Limine by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M)(Noona, Stephen)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
I/P ENGINE, INC.
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512
AOL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
DECLARATION OF MARGARET P. KAMMERUD IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’
OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE
I, Margaret P. Kammerud, declare as follows:
1.
I am an attorney in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and am
counsel for Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) in the above-captioned case. I provide this
declaration upon personal knowledge and, if called upon as a witness, would testify competently
as to the matters recited herein.
2.
Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office communication granting ex parte reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,314,420, dated July
18, 2012, bearing control numbers G-IPE-0888193 through G-IPE-0888210..
3.
Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the September
21, 2012 deposition of plaintiff's expert Jamie Carbonell.
01980.51928/4978295.1
4.
Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Report of
Defendants' Expert Lyle H. Ungar, Ph.D., Concerning Invalidity, dated July 25, 2012.
5.
Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the Second Supplemental
Initial Disclosures of Google Inc., dated August 7, 2012.
6.
Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the June 19, 2012
Deposition of Google Inc. by and through its Corporate Designee James W. Maccoun.
7.
Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of Defendants' Rule 26(a)(3)
Witness List, dated September 19, 2012.
8.
Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of the Subpoena to Gary Culliss
to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, dated August 31, 2012.
9.
Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of the Subpoena to Ruben Ortega
to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, dated August 31, 2012.
10.
Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Initial
Pretrial Disclosure, dated September 19, 2012.
11.
Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office communication rejecting each of the asserted claims of the '420 patent as unpatentable
over, or anticipated by, prior art references, dated September 25, 2012.
12.
Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Report of
Defendants' Expert Lyle H. Ungar, Ph.D., concerning noninfringment, dated August 30, 2012.
13.
Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s
Updated Initial Disclosures, dated August 8, 2012.
01980.51928/4978295.1
14.
Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the July 31,
2012 deposition of plaintiff's expert Mark Blais.
15.
At Rubin Ortega’s September 25, 2012 deposition, Plaintiff questioned Mr. Ortega at
length about the meaning and interpretation of various claims and passages from his patent.
I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is
true and correct.
Dated: September 27, 2012
Margaret P. Kammerud
01980.51928/4978295.1
DATED: September 27, 2012
/s/ Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624.3000
Facsimile: (757) 624.3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
David Bilsker
David A. Perlson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com
davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com
Counsel for Google Inc., Target Corporation,
IAC Search & Media, Inc., and
Gannett Co., Inc.
By: /s/ Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 W. Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624-3000
Facsimile: (757) 624-3169
Robert L. Burns
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &
DUNNER, LLP
Two Freedom Square
11955 Freedom Drive
Reston, VA 20190
Telephone: (571) 203-2700
Facsimile: (202) 408-4400
01980.51928/4978295.1
Cortney S. Alexander
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT &
DUNNER, LLP
3500 SunTrust Plaza
303 Peachtree Street, NE
Atlanta, GA 94111
Telephone: (404) 653-6400
Facsimile: (415) 653-6444
Counsel for Defendant AOL, Inc.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on September 27, 2012, I will electronically file the foregoing with
the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing (NEF)
to the following:
Jeffrey K. Sherwood
Kenneth W. Brothers
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 420-2200
Facsimile: (202) 420-2201
sherwoodj@dicksteinshapiro.com
brothersk@dicksteinshapiro.com
Donald C. Schultz
W. Ryan Snow
Steven Stancliff
CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 1500
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 623-3000
Facsimile: (757) 623-5735
dschultz@cwm-law.cm
wrsnow@cwm-law.com
sstancliff@cwm-law.com
Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc.
01980.51928/4978295.1
/s/ Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624.3000
Facsimile: (757) 624.3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
01980.51928/4978295.1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?