I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 438

Declaration re 433 Opposition, 432 Opposition, 434 Opposition, of Margaret P. Kammerud in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motions in Limine by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M)(Noona, Stephen)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA NORFOLK DIVISION I/P ENGINE, INC. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512 AOL, INC., et al., Defendants. DECLARATION OF MARGARET P. KAMMERUD IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS IN LIMINE I, Margaret P. Kammerud, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney in the law firm of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP and am counsel for Defendant Google Inc. (“Google”) in the above-captioned case. I provide this declaration upon personal knowledge and, if called upon as a witness, would testify competently as to the matters recited herein. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office communication granting ex parte reexamination of U.S. Patent No. 6,314,420, dated July 18, 2012, bearing control numbers G-IPE-0888193 through G-IPE-0888210.. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the September 21, 2012 deposition of plaintiff's expert Jamie Carbonell. 01980.51928/4978295.1 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Report of Defendants' Expert Lyle H. Ungar, Ph.D., Concerning Invalidity, dated July 25, 2012. 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit D is a true and correct copy of the Second Supplemental Initial Disclosures of Google Inc., dated August 7, 2012. 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit E is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the June 19, 2012 Deposition of Google Inc. by and through its Corporate Designee James W. Maccoun. 7. Attached hereto as Exhibit F is a true and correct copy of Defendants' Rule 26(a)(3) Witness List, dated September 19, 2012. 8. Attached hereto as Exhibit G is a true and correct copy of the Subpoena to Gary Culliss to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, dated August 31, 2012. 9. Attached hereto as Exhibit H is a true and correct copy of the Subpoena to Ruben Ortega to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action, dated August 31, 2012. 10. Attached hereto as Exhibit I is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Initial Pretrial Disclosure, dated September 19, 2012. 11. Attached hereto as Exhibit J is a true and correct copy of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office communication rejecting each of the asserted claims of the '420 patent as unpatentable over, or anticipated by, prior art references, dated September 25, 2012. 12. Attached hereto as Exhibit K is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the Report of Defendants' Expert Lyle H. Ungar, Ph.D., concerning noninfringment, dated August 30, 2012. 13. Attached hereto as Exhibit L is a true and correct copy of Plaintiff I/P Engine, Inc.'s Updated Initial Disclosures, dated August 8, 2012. 01980.51928/4978295.1 14. Attached hereto as Exhibit M is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the July 31, 2012 deposition of plaintiff's expert Mark Blais. 15. At Rubin Ortega’s September 25, 2012 deposition, Plaintiff questioned Mr. Ortega at length about the meaning and interpretation of various claims and passages from his patent. I declare under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct. Dated: September 27, 2012 Margaret P. Kammerud 01980.51928/4978295.1 DATED: September 27, 2012 /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624.3000 Facsimile: (757) 624.3169 senoona@kaufcan.com David Bilsker David A. Perlson QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com Counsel for Google Inc., Target Corporation, IAC Search & Media, Inc., and Gannett Co., Inc. By: /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 W. Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624-3000 Facsimile: (757) 624-3169 Robert L. Burns FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP Two Freedom Square 11955 Freedom Drive Reston, VA 20190 Telephone: (571) 203-2700 Facsimile: (202) 408-4400 01980.51928/4978295.1 Cortney S. Alexander FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP 3500 SunTrust Plaza 303 Peachtree Street, NE Atlanta, GA 94111 Telephone: (404) 653-6400 Facsimile: (415) 653-6444 Counsel for Defendant AOL, Inc. CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on September 27, 2012, I will electronically file the foregoing with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing (NEF) to the following: Jeffrey K. Sherwood Kenneth W. Brothers DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP 1825 Eye Street NW Washington, DC 20006 Telephone: (202) 420-2200 Facsimile: (202) 420-2201 sherwoodj@dicksteinshapiro.com brothersk@dicksteinshapiro.com Donald C. Schultz W. Ryan Snow Steven Stancliff CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 1500 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 623-3000 Facsimile: (757) 623-5735 dschultz@cwm-law.cm wrsnow@cwm-law.com sstancliff@cwm-law.com Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc. 01980.51928/4978295.1 /s/ Stephen E. Noona Stephen E. Noona Virginia State Bar No. 25367 KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C. 150 West Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624.3000 Facsimile: (757) 624.3169 senoona@kaufcan.com       01980.51928/4978295.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?