I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
606
Response to 206 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Google Inc.s Brief In Support Of Motion To Compel And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Jen Ghaussy in Support Thereof Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit H (Undreacted, Public Form), # 2 Exhibit I (Unredacted, Public Form), # 3 Exhibit L (Unredacted, Public Form), # 4 Exhibit M (Unredacted, Public Form), # 5 Exhibit N (Unredacted, Public Form), # 6 Exhibit P (Unredacted, Public Form), # 7 Exhibit Q (Unredacted, Public Form), # 8 Exhibit R (Unredacted, Public Form), # 9 Exhibit S (Undredacted, Public Form), # 10 Exhibit T (Unredacted, Public Form), # 11 Exhibit U (Unredacted, Public Form))(Noona, Stephen)
EXHIBIT R
Page 1
1
Volume I
Pages 1 - 157
2
Exhibits 1 - 20
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
5
NORFOLK DIVISION
6
********************
7
I/P ENGINE, INC.,
8
9
10
*
Plaintiff,
*
Civil Action No.
Vs.
*
2:11-cv-512
AOL, INC., et al.,
*
11
Defendants.
*
12
********************
13
14
AUDIO/VISUAL DEPOSITION of LYCOS, INC.,
15
by and through its designee MARK BLAIS
16
Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 9:00 a.m.
17
Goulston & Storrs
18
50 Rowes Wharf, 7th Floor
19
Boston, Massachusetts
20
21
------ Jacqueline P. Shields, RPR, CSR ------
22
23
24
Job No. CS409539
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Page 95
1
Q.
And looking at the left-hand side, on
2
behalf of Lycos, Inc. it looks like it was signed by
3
counsel at Dickstein Shapiro?
4
A.
Yes.
5
Q.
Did Dickstein Shapiro represent Lycos in
6
its litigation with Blockbuster?
7
A.
Yes.
8
Q.
Did Dickstein Shapiro also represent Lycos
9
in its litigation with TiVo?
10
11
A.
late.
Yes.
Not at the beginning.
They came in
Later in the case.
12
Q.
When did they come in?
13
A.
I think during the time that the summary
14
judgment motions were being drafted and filed, but
15
at that time we were still being represented
16
principally by McDermott, Will & Emery.
17
Q.
Did that change at some point?
18
A.
Yes.
19
Q.
When was that?
20
A.
After the Court's ruling in the case we
21
changed to Dickstein representing us.
22
Q.
Does Dickstein still representing Lycos?
23
A.
No.
24
Q.
When did Dickstein stop representing Lycos?
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Page 96
1
A.
As of the end of this case.
2
Q.
Was Lycos ever offered to license the '420
3
patent to anyone other than -- anyone other than
4
TiVo?
5
A.
I don't think we ever made a specific offer
6
to license it to TiVo.
7
just as part of the family.
8
terms, but other than its inclusion in there, no.
9
10
Q.
I think we included it as a,
It was part of their
Similarly, has Lycos ever made an offer to
anyone to license the '664 patent?
11
A.
No.
12
Q.
Has anyone ever contacted Lycos to request
13
the license to the '420 patent?
14
A.
No.
15
Q.
Similarly, has anyone ever contacted Lycos
16
to request the license to the '664 patent?
17
A.
No.
18
Q.
Has Lycos ever contacted Google regarding
19
licensing the '420 patent?
20
A.
Not that I'm aware of.
21
Q.
Similarly, has Lycos ever contacted Google
22
regarding licensing of the '664 patent?
23
A.
Not that I'm aware of.
24
Q.
You can set that one aside.
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Page 126
1
2
A.
letter of intent to purchase that portfolio.
3
4
At a certain point we entered an LOI,
Q.
When you say the patent portfolio, you mean
the entire portfolio?
5
A.
6
advice.
7
Q.
8
9
The entire portfolio.
Against my better
Do you recall what the terms of the LOI
were?
A.
Generally.
They changed because we, at
10
first we entered an LOI subject to, I believe,
11
90 days of due diligence.
12
we were going to sell them the patent portfolio in
13
whole for around 4 or 4 and a half million.
14
Q.
We, I believe, initially
Do you know who conducted -- well, first,
15
do you know if any due diligence occurred subject to
16
that letter of intent?
17
A.
Yes.
18
Q.
Do you know who conducted the due
19
20
21
22
23
24
diligence?
A.
Altitude itself did.
They had an in-house
counsel.
Q.
Do you know if they had any outside counsel
involved?
A.
They did.
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Page 127
1
Q.
Who was that?
2
A.
It was Dickstein Shapiro.
3
Q.
At the time that it occurred was Dickstein
4
Shapiro still representing Lycos?
5
A.
They had not started to represent Lycos
6
yet.
7
Dickstein at that time.
8
9
I did not have any direct communications with
Q.
Does Lycos have any knowledge as to the
results of that due diligence?
10
A.
Only what I was told by Warren.
11
Q.
And that is?
12
A.
And that is -- well, one of the issues was
13
with the patents in suit at the time, we wanted out
14
of litigation, and so we either needed them to step
15
in after the fact.
16
them, we no longer have standing to prosecute the
17
litigation, and we didn't want to remain in it in
18
name or any capacity.
19
litigation, so we could do the deal.
20
them outright, it came to a point where they also
21
didn't like the jurisdiction.
22
liked the patents differently or not, they are
23
pretty careful of not sharing that type of
24
information with me.
If we sold them and assigned
Or we had to finish up the
And to sell
I don't know if they
It came to a point where they
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Page 131
1
anything.
So when it got to that point, our hands
2
were tied.
And I think Ybrant wanted to look at
3
this after the fact if they were buying our company.
4
They wanted to buy it in place.
5
negotiations at that time.
6
Q.
So we stopped all
Did Lycos ever begin negotiations regarding
7
the sale of its patents after it entered -- after
8
its acquisition by Ybrant?
9
MS. ALBERT:
Okay.
Vague.
10
A.
Say that one more time.
11
Q.
It's a terrible question.
12
A.
I didn't say that.
13
Q.
That's fair.
Sorry.
Let's try again.
I will, I will own that.
Did
14
Lycos and Altitude Capital ever have any other
15
negotiations regarding the sale of patents after the
16
spring of 2010?
17
A.
18
After the -MS. ALBERT:
Objection.
Vague.
19
A.
After the fall of 2010, yes.
20
Q.
And when was that?
21
A.
That would have been sometime late spring
22
or summer 2011.
23
Q.
What patents were involved in that
24
negotiation?
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Page 132
1
A.
Well, I was contacted by another -- at that
2
time we were not, we did not -- let me step back.
3
We had received an offer from a third party, another
4
party related to the patents in suit here.
5
Q.
And who is that third party?
6
A.
Stayko Staykov.
7
And that is S-T-A-Y-K-O
S-T-A-Y-K-O-V.
8
Q.
Who is Stayko Staykov?
9
A.
He's from that Borat movie, I think.
No,
10
he owns an intellectual property investment type of
11
company.
12
if I remember correctly.
13
And he's invested in intellectual portfolio s
14
before, and he contacted me.
I believe it was called Eidos, E-I-D-O-S,
And a smaller company.
15
Q.
And when did he contact you?
16
A.
Sometimes in the spring of 2011.
17
18
And he
came up and met with me.
Q.
When you said the patent at issue in this
19
case, which patents specifically did he indicate
20
that he was interested in?
21
A.
The '664 patent and the '420 patent.
22
Q.
Any others?
23
A.
Well, I mean, I think the discussion
24
necessarily included the whole patent family.
So if
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Page 133
1
I remember correctly, he -- I don't know if he
2
actually cited those two specifically, but he wanted
3
the family of patents.
4
Q.
When did you first meet with him?
5
A.
Spring of 2011, I believe.
6
Q.
Did he make an offer to purchase the patent
7
of families at the time?
8
that time?
9
A.
The family of patents at
After our meeting he did some brief due
10
diligence and sent me some information about
11
himself, and then made an offer.
12
Q.
And what was that offer?
13
A.
It's hard for me to remember right now, but
14
it was in the 1 million range.
15
point we're only talking about this one patent
16
family, not the whole portfolio.
17
18
19
20
21
22
Q.
And, again, at this
Did he say why he was interested in this
patent family?
A.
I think he just said so that he could
monetize it in some fashion.
Q.
Did he tell you how he identified this
patent family?
23
A.
I know that Dickstein had him contact me.
24
Q.
How did you respond to the offer from Mr.
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Page 134
1
Staykov?
2
A.
I told him it was too low.
3
Q.
Did you provide a counter offer?
4
A.
It took a while for me to get any response
5
from Israel, which is where our parent company's
6
kind of business is operated.
7
parent company is operated.
8
located in Indiana, but the business operations of
9
Ybrant is in Israel.
10
It's not where our
Our parent company is
It took me a while to get a
response back.
11
In the meantime I spoke with our CEO, who
12
told me to see if I could get other parties
13
involved, and that's when I reached out to Altitude
14
again and said, hey, you know, the previous LOI's
15
have no effect anymore, but I wanted to give you a
16
courtesy call, give you a heads-up that we're in
17
discussion to sell this one patent family, not our
18
portfolio anymore, and that we have an offer on the
19
table.
And if you want to throw in your hat, let me
20
know.
So they were a little perturbed by that whole
21
thing, but it's business.
22
put me in contact with another company, which was
23
Hudson Bay Capital, and Alex Burger.
24
Q.
And then Dickstein also
Is Dickstein representing Lycos at the
Veritext Corporate Services
800-567-8658
973-410-4040
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?