I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 606

Response to 206 MOTION to Seal Portions Of Google Inc.s Brief In Support Of Motion To Compel And Various Exhibits To The Declaration Of Jen Ghaussy in Support Thereof Notice of Filing Response to Agreed Order to Maintain Portions of Documents Under Seal filed by AOL Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit H (Undreacted, Public Form), # 2 Exhibit I (Unredacted, Public Form), # 3 Exhibit L (Unredacted, Public Form), # 4 Exhibit M (Unredacted, Public Form), # 5 Exhibit N (Unredacted, Public Form), # 6 Exhibit P (Unredacted, Public Form), # 7 Exhibit Q (Unredacted, Public Form), # 8 Exhibit R (Unredacted, Public Form), # 9 Exhibit S (Undredacted, Public Form), # 10 Exhibit T (Unredacted, Public Form), # 11 Exhibit U (Unredacted, Public Form))(Noona, Stephen)

Download PDF
 EXHIBIT R  Page 1 1 Volume I Pages 1 - 157 2 Exhibits 1 - 20 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA 5 NORFOLK DIVISION 6 ******************** 7 I/P ENGINE, INC., 8 9 10 * Plaintiff, * Civil Action No. Vs. * 2:11-cv-512 AOL, INC., et al., * 11 Defendants. * 12 ******************** 13 14 AUDIO/VISUAL DEPOSITION of LYCOS, INC., 15 by and through its designee MARK BLAIS 16 Tuesday, July 31, 2012 at 9:00 a.m. 17 Goulston & Storrs 18 50 Rowes Wharf, 7th Floor 19 Boston, Massachusetts 20 21 ------ Jacqueline P. Shields, RPR, CSR ------ 22 23 24 Job No. CS409539 Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 Page 95 1 Q. And looking at the left-hand side, on 2 behalf of Lycos, Inc. it looks like it was signed by 3 counsel at Dickstein Shapiro? 4 A. Yes. 5 Q. Did Dickstein Shapiro represent Lycos in 6 its litigation with Blockbuster? 7 A. Yes. 8 Q. Did Dickstein Shapiro also represent Lycos 9 in its litigation with TiVo? 10 11 A. late. Yes. Not at the beginning. They came in Later in the case. 12 Q. When did they come in? 13 A. I think during the time that the summary 14 judgment motions were being drafted and filed, but 15 at that time we were still being represented 16 principally by McDermott, Will & Emery. 17 Q. Did that change at some point? 18 A. Yes. 19 Q. When was that? 20 A. After the Court's ruling in the case we 21 changed to Dickstein representing us. 22 Q. Does Dickstein still representing Lycos? 23 A. No. 24 Q. When did Dickstein stop representing Lycos? Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 Page 96 1 A. As of the end of this case. 2 Q. Was Lycos ever offered to license the '420 3 patent to anyone other than -- anyone other than 4 TiVo? 5 A. I don't think we ever made a specific offer 6 to license it to TiVo. 7 just as part of the family. 8 terms, but other than its inclusion in there, no. 9 10 Q. I think we included it as a, It was part of their Similarly, has Lycos ever made an offer to anyone to license the '664 patent? 11 A. No. 12 Q. Has anyone ever contacted Lycos to request 13 the license to the '420 patent? 14 A. No. 15 Q. Similarly, has anyone ever contacted Lycos 16 to request the license to the '664 patent? 17 A. No. 18 Q. Has Lycos ever contacted Google regarding 19 licensing the '420 patent? 20 A. Not that I'm aware of. 21 Q. Similarly, has Lycos ever contacted Google 22 regarding licensing of the '664 patent? 23 A. Not that I'm aware of. 24 Q. You can set that one aside. Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 Page 126 1 2 A. letter of intent to purchase that portfolio. 3 4 At a certain point we entered an LOI, Q. When you say the patent portfolio, you mean the entire portfolio? 5 A. 6 advice. 7 Q. 8 9 The entire portfolio. Against my better Do you recall what the terms of the LOI were? A. Generally. They changed because we, at 10 first we entered an LOI subject to, I believe, 11 90 days of due diligence. 12 we were going to sell them the patent portfolio in 13 whole for around 4 or 4 and a half million. 14 Q. We, I believe, initially Do you know who conducted -- well, first, 15 do you know if any due diligence occurred subject to 16 that letter of intent? 17 A. Yes. 18 Q. Do you know who conducted the due 19 20 21 22 23 24 diligence? A. Altitude itself did. They had an in-house counsel. Q. Do you know if they had any outside counsel involved? A. They did. Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 Page 127 1 Q. Who was that? 2 A. It was Dickstein Shapiro. 3 Q. At the time that it occurred was Dickstein 4 Shapiro still representing Lycos? 5 A. They had not started to represent Lycos 6 yet. 7 Dickstein at that time. 8 9 I did not have any direct communications with Q. Does Lycos have any knowledge as to the results of that due diligence? 10 A. Only what I was told by Warren. 11 Q. And that is? 12 A. And that is -- well, one of the issues was 13 with the patents in suit at the time, we wanted out 14 of litigation, and so we either needed them to step 15 in after the fact. 16 them, we no longer have standing to prosecute the 17 litigation, and we didn't want to remain in it in 18 name or any capacity. 19 litigation, so we could do the deal. 20 them outright, it came to a point where they also 21 didn't like the jurisdiction. 22 liked the patents differently or not, they are 23 pretty careful of not sharing that type of 24 information with me. If we sold them and assigned Or we had to finish up the And to sell I don't know if they It came to a point where they Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 Page 131 1 anything. So when it got to that point, our hands 2 were tied. And I think Ybrant wanted to look at 3 this after the fact if they were buying our company. 4 They wanted to buy it in place. 5 negotiations at that time. 6 Q. So we stopped all Did Lycos ever begin negotiations regarding 7 the sale of its patents after it entered -- after 8 its acquisition by Ybrant? 9 MS. ALBERT: Okay. Vague. 10 A. Say that one more time. 11 Q. It's a terrible question. 12 A. I didn't say that. 13 Q. That's fair. Sorry. Let's try again. I will, I will own that. Did 14 Lycos and Altitude Capital ever have any other 15 negotiations regarding the sale of patents after the 16 spring of 2010? 17 A. 18 After the -MS. ALBERT: Objection. Vague. 19 A. After the fall of 2010, yes. 20 Q. And when was that? 21 A. That would have been sometime late spring 22 or summer 2011. 23 Q. What patents were involved in that 24 negotiation? Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 Page 132 1 A. Well, I was contacted by another -- at that 2 time we were not, we did not -- let me step back. 3 We had received an offer from a third party, another 4 party related to the patents in suit here. 5 Q. And who is that third party? 6 A. Stayko Staykov. 7 And that is S-T-A-Y-K-O S-T-A-Y-K-O-V. 8 Q. Who is Stayko Staykov? 9 A. He's from that Borat movie, I think. No, 10 he owns an intellectual property investment type of 11 company. 12 if I remember correctly. 13 And he's invested in intellectual portfolio s 14 before, and he contacted me. I believe it was called Eidos, E-I-D-O-S, And a smaller company. 15 Q. And when did he contact you? 16 A. Sometimes in the spring of 2011. 17 18 And he came up and met with me. Q. When you said the patent at issue in this 19 case, which patents specifically did he indicate 20 that he was interested in? 21 A. The '664 patent and the '420 patent. 22 Q. Any others? 23 A. Well, I mean, I think the discussion 24 necessarily included the whole patent family. So if Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 Page 133 1 I remember correctly, he -- I don't know if he 2 actually cited those two specifically, but he wanted 3 the family of patents. 4 Q. When did you first meet with him? 5 A. Spring of 2011, I believe. 6 Q. Did he make an offer to purchase the patent 7 of families at the time? 8 that time? 9 A. The family of patents at After our meeting he did some brief due 10 diligence and sent me some information about 11 himself, and then made an offer. 12 Q. And what was that offer? 13 A. It's hard for me to remember right now, but 14 it was in the 1 million range. 15 point we're only talking about this one patent 16 family, not the whole portfolio. 17 18 19 20 21 22 Q. And, again, at this Did he say why he was interested in this patent family? A. I think he just said so that he could monetize it in some fashion. Q. Did he tell you how he identified this patent family? 23 A. I know that Dickstein had him contact me. 24 Q. How did you respond to the offer from Mr. Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040 Page 134 1 Staykov? 2 A. I told him it was too low. 3 Q. Did you provide a counter offer? 4 A. It took a while for me to get any response 5 from Israel, which is where our parent company's 6 kind of business is operated. 7 parent company is operated. 8 located in Indiana, but the business operations of 9 Ybrant is in Israel. 10 It's not where our Our parent company is It took me a while to get a response back. 11 In the meantime I spoke with our CEO, who 12 told me to see if I could get other parties 13 involved, and that's when I reached out to Altitude 14 again and said, hey, you know, the previous LOI's 15 have no effect anymore, but I wanted to give you a 16 courtesy call, give you a heads-up that we're in 17 discussion to sell this one patent family, not our 18 portfolio anymore, and that we have an offer on the 19 table. And if you want to throw in your hat, let me 20 know. So they were a little perturbed by that whole 21 thing, but it's business. 22 put me in contact with another company, which was 23 Hudson Bay Capital, and Alex Burger. 24 Q. And then Dickstein also Is Dickstein representing Lycos at the Veritext Corporate Services 800-567-8658 973-410-4040

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?