I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
795
Declaration re 792 MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, POST-JUDGMENT INTEREST, AND SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES FOR DEFENDANTS POST-DISCOVERY/PRE-VERDICT INFRINGEMENT of Dawn Rudenko, Esq. by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
Exhibit 3
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Albert, Dawn Rudenko
Wednesday, November 07, 2012 4:52 PM
Sarah Agudo; Monterio, Charles
QE-IP Engine; Stephen E. Noona (senoona@kaufcan.com); zz-IPEngine; W. Ryan Snow
(wrsnow@cwm-law.com); Donald C. Schultz (dschultz@cwm-law.com)
RE: I/P Engine v. AOL et al. Supplemental Interrogatory No. 15
Sarah,
Please review the Court's opinion in the Active Video case relating to this issue. That decision makes clear that 1/P Engine
is entitled to supplemental damages. Accordingly, we renew our request for an accounting as set forth in my previous
email.
If Defendants continue to refuse to provide the supplemental information, please let me know when you are available to
meet and confer on this issue tomorrow.
Regards,
Dawn Rudenko Albert
Dickstein Shapiro LLP
(212) 277-6715
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?