I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
84
Joint MOTION for Protective Order and Memorandum in Support of Joint Motion for Entry of Agreed Protective Order by AOL, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc., Google, Inc., I/P Engine, Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Noona, Stephen)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
NORFOLK DIVISION
I/P ENGINE, INC.
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-512
AOL, INC., et al.,
Defendants.
JOINT MOTION AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF JOINT MOTION FOR
ENTRY OF AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER
The parties, by counsel, pursuant to Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and
Rule 5 of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia (“Local Rules of Practice”), move this Court for the entry of the parties’ Agreed Protective
Order (“Agreed Protective Order”), a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 1, and in support thereof
state as follows:
1.
This is a patent infringement matter in which the plaintiff and the defendants have
asserted claims against each other under the patent law.
2.
During discovery, the parties and non-parties will be producing confidential,
proprietary, non-public financial information, and commercially sensitive information, all of which
is defined as protective material under the parties’ Agreed Protective Order.
3.
The parties have agreed to, and attach as Exhibit 1 to this motion, a proposed
Agreed Protective Order, a copy of which will be fully endorsed by counsel and forwarded to the
Court. The entry of this Agreed Protective Order will facilitate the exchange of discovery in this
matter and the protection of confidential, proprietary information.
4.
The Agreed Protective Order provides that any materials to be sealed shall be filed
in accordance with Rule 5 of the Local Rules of Practice.
WHEREFORE, the parties, by counsel, request that this Court enter the Agreed Protective
Order attached as Exhibit 1.
Dated: January 19, 2012
Respectfully submitted:
/s/ Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624.3000
Facsimile: (757) 624.3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
David Bilsker
David A. Perlson
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 875-6600
Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
davidbilsker@quinnemanuel.com
davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com
Attorneys for Attorneys or IAC Search &
Media, Inc., Gannett Company, Inc.,
Google Inc. and Target Corporation
2
/s/ Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624-3000
Facsimile: (757) 624-3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
Gerald F. Ivey
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT
& DUNNER, LLP
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001-4413
Telephone: (202) 408-4000
gerald.ivey@finnegan.com
Robert L. Burns
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT
& DUNNER, LLP
Two Freedom Square
11955 Freedom Drive, Suite 800
Reston, VA 20190-5675
Telephone: (571) 203-2700
robert.burns@finnegan.com
Cortney S. Alexander
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT
& DUNNER, LLP
3500 SunTrust Plaza
303 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30308
Tel: 404.653.6400
cortney.alexander@finnegan.com
Attorneys for Defendant AOL Inc.
/s/ Donald C. Schultz
Donald C. Schultz
W. Ryan Snow
Steven Stancliff
CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 1500
Norfolk, VA 23510
3
Telephone: (757) 623-3000
Facsimile: (757) 623-5735
dschultz@cwm-law.cm
wrsnow@cwm-law.com
sstancliff@cwm-law.com
Jeffrey K. Sherwood
Kenneth W. Brothers
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 420-2200
Facsimile: (202) 420-2201
sherwoodj@dicksteinshapiro.com
brothersk@dicksteinshapiro.com
Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc.
4
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on January 19, 2012, I will electronically file the foregoing with the
Clerk of the Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send a notification of such filing (NEF) to
the following:
Jeffrey K. Sherwood
Kenneth W. Brothers
DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP
1825 Eye Street NW
Washington, DC 20006
Telephone: (202) 420-2200
Facsimile: (202) 420-2201
sherwoodj@dicksteinshapiro.com
brothersk@dicksteinshapiro.com
Donald C. Schultz
W. Ryan Snow
Steven Stancliff
CRENSHAW, WARE & MARTIN, P.L.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 1500
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 623-3000
Facsimile: (757) 623-5735
dschultz@cwm-law.cm
wrsnow@cwm-law.com
sstancliff@cwm-law.com
Counsel for Plaintiff, I/P Engine, Inc.
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624-3000
Facsimile: (757) 624-3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
Counsel for Google, Inc.,
Target Corporation,
IAC Search & Media, Inc., and
Gannet Co., Inc.
5
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624-3000
Facsimile: (757) 624-3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
Gerald F. Ivey
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
901 New York Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20001-4413
Telephone: (202) 408-4000
gerald.ivey@finnegan.com
Robert L. Burns
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
Two Freedom Square
11955 Freedom Drive, Suite 800
Reston, VA 20190-5675
Telephone: (571) 203-2700
robert.burns@finnegan.com
Cortney S. Alexander
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3500 SunTrust Plaza
303 Peachtree Street NE
Atlanta, GA 30308
Tel: 404.653.6400
cortney.alexander@finnegan.com
Attorneys for Defendant AOL Inc.
/s/ Stephen E. Noona
Stephen E. Noona
Virginia State Bar No. 25367
KAUFMAN & CANOLES, P.C.
150 West Main Street, Suite 2100
Norfolk, VA 23510
Telephone: (757) 624.3000
Facsimile: (757) 624.3169
senoona@kaufcan.com
11498333_1.DOC
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?