I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
ORDER directing Defendants to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties within 15 days of the entry of this Order; permitting Plaintiff to file a reply to Defendants' response within 7 days. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/3/13. (mwin, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
p| j £ jj
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
APR - 3 2013
CLERK, US DISTRICT COURT
I/P ENGINE, INC.,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:llcv512
On January 23, 2013, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Postpone Briefing and
Ruling on Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 847) in order to permit the
Court to consider other post-trial motions. Having considered and ruled on several relevant posttrial motions, the Court is now prepared to consider Plaintiffs request for post-judgment
royalties. As such, Defendants are ORDERED to respond to Plaintiffs Motion for PostJudgment Royalties within FIFTEEN (15) DAYS ofthe entry ofthis Order. Plaintiff is
permitted to file areply to Defendants' response within SEVEN (7) DAYS, at which point, the
motion will be ripe for judicial disposition. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send acopy ofthis
Order to counsel and parties of record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 3 ,2013
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?