I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al
Filing
927
Opposition to 926 MOTION to Expedite and Memorandum in Support of Motion to Expedite the Briefing on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by I/P Engine, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5)(Sherwood, Jeffrey)
Exhibit 4
4
Best,
Meg
Proposed Schedule:
∙ May 17 ‐ Source code available for review
∙ On or before June 7 ‐ Provide Bartholomew Furrow for deposition
∙ June 21 ‐ Plaintiff to serve any additional expert declaration or revised motion.
∙ July 2 ‐ Dr. Becker (or any other expert on whom Plaintiff may rely) will be made available for deposition
by this date.
∙ Defendants will have two weeks from final expert(s) deposition to file opposition.
∙ Plaintiff will have two weeks from filing of opposition to file reply.
Margaret P. Kammerud
Associate,
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
50 California Street, 22nd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
415-875-6316 Direct
415.875.6600 Main Office Number
415.875.6700 FAX
margaretkammerud@quinnemanuel.com
www.quinnemanuel.com
NOTICE: The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. This message
may be an attorney-client communication and/or work product and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient or agent responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error and that any
review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
by e-mail, and delete the original message.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?