I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 930

ORDER re 923 MOTION to Compel Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiff's Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties filed by Google Inc., AOL Inc., IAC Search & Media, Inc., Target Corporation, Gannett Company, Inc. ORDERED that Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 923) WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS of the entry of this Order. Defendants shall forego filing a Reply brief in support of their motion. Briefing on Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 822) is hereby SUSPENDED until the Court rules on Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties. The Court will provide additional instructions regarding briefing schedule of Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties upon resolution of Defendants renewed motion. Signed by District Judge Raymond A. Jackson and filed on 4/17/2013. (bnew)

FILED
APR 17 2013

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division

.

CLLRK. US. DISTRICT COURT
NORFOLK. VA

I/P ENGINE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:llcv512

AOL INC., et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER

On January 23,2013, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Postpone Briefing and

Ruling on Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 847) in order to permit the
Court to consider other post-trial motions. Having considered and ruled on several relevant posttrial motions, on April 2,2013, the Court directed the Defendants to response to Plaintiffs
Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties within fifteen days of the entry of said order. Further, the

Court permitted the Plaintiff to file a reply to Defendants' response within seven days, at which
point, the motion would be ripe for judicial disposition. However, since the entry of the Court's
April 2,2013 Order, the Defendants filed a Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr.
Becker and For Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties
(ECF No. 923). The Defendants have also requested expedited consideration of their renewed
motion, consideration which the Plaintiff opposes. Having reviewed the pleadings, it is
ORDERED that:

•

Plaintiff shall respond to Defendants' Renewed Motion to Compel Deposition of Dr.
Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Post-Judgment
Royalties (ECF No. 923) WITHIN FIVE (5) DAYS of the entry of this Order.
Defendants shall forego filing a Reply brief in support of their motion.

•

Briefing on Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment Royalties (ECF No. 822)
is hereby SUSPENDED until the Court rules on Defendants' Renewed Motion to
Compel Deposition of Dr. Becker and for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs
Motion for Post-Judgment Royalties. The Court will provide additional instructions
regarding briefing schedule of Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Post-Judgment
Royalties upon resolution of Defendants renewed motion.
The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a copy of this Order to counsel and parties of record.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Norfolk, Virginia

April //.2013

Raymond A. Jackson
United States District Judge