I/P Engine, Inc. v. AOL, Inc. et al

Filing 96

Declaration re 95 Reply to Response to Motion of Margaret Kammerud in Support of Google's Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Plaintiff to Provide Conception, Reduction-to-Practice, and Priority Date Information for the Patents-in-Suit by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit L, # 2 Exhibit M, # 3 Exhibit N, # 4 Exhibit O, # 5 Exhibit P, # 6 Exhibit Q)(Noona, Stephen)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA I/P ENGINE, INC., No. 2:11-cv-00512-RAJ-FBS Plaintiff, v. Jury Trial Demanded AOL, INC., GOOGLE INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., GANNETT COMPANY, INC., and TARGET CORPORATION, Defendants. EXHIBIT M TO DECLARATION OF MARGARET KAMMERUD IN SUPPORT OF GOOGLE’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO COMPEL PLAINTIFF TO PROVIDE CONCEPTION, REDUCTION-TO-PRACTICE, AND PRIORITY DATE INFORMATION FOR THE PATENTS-IN-SUIT FILED UNDER SEAL 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?