Federico et al v. Lincoln Military Housing, LLC et al
Filing
325
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part and denying in part 226 MOTION to QUASH AND/OR LIMIT SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM ISSUED TO LOCAL TV. LLC, D/B/A WTKR TELEVISION, AND LAURIE SIMMONS AND OBJECTIONS TO SUBPOENAS DUCES TECUM. Signed by Magistrate Judge Douglas E. Miller and filed on 8/13/14. (tbro)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division
SHELLEY FEDERICO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CaseNo.:2:12-CV-80
LINCOLN MILITARY HOUSING, LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM ORDER
This consolidated action involves claims of injury and damage allegedly arising from
mold in military housing provided by certain Defendants under long-term agreements with the
United States Military. The matters raised by the various actions received coverage by the media,
including extensive coverage by local television station, WTKR. As a result, Defendants issued
subpoenas to WTKR and its reporter Laurie Simmons, seeking information related to the
litigation. Both Simmons and WTKR filed a Motion to Quash (ECF No. 226) the subpoena and
the parties, by counsel, appeared for oral argument. For the reasons stated on the record, the
Court GRANTED in part and DENIED in part the motion, and issues this Memorandum Order to
articulate the view of the law underlying this decision.
As written, Defendants' subpoenas requested far more information than necessary or
relevant to the present actions. For example, the subpoenas define "Home" and "Homes" as
"each and every home owned or managed by Defendants during the period covered by the
Consolidated Actions." (ECF No. 226-1 at 7 and ECF No. 226-2 at 7). These definitions, which
are used throughout the subpoenas, are unnecessarily broad - encompassing properties owned or
managed by Defendants nationwide, far beyond the scope of WTKR's localized coverage.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?