United States of America, for the use of Advance Concrete, LLC v. THR Enterprises, Inc. et al
Filing
18
ORDER adopting and approving in full the findings and recommendations set forth in 15 Report and Recommendations; granting in part and denying in part 5 Motion to Dismiss, allowing the contract claim as pled, but dismissing the quantum meruit claim, and plaintiff's claim for attorney's fees; denying 6 Motion for More Definite Statement; denying 7 Motion to Stay. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 8/24/12. (mwin, )
UNITED
STATES
DISTRICT
COURT
Fll FH
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
*N DISTRICT OF VI!
' n~L-1-^
Norfolk Division
AUG 2 4 2012
UNITED
STATES
ex rel.
OF AMERICA,
ADVANCE CONCRETE,
CLERK, US DISTRICT COURT
LLC,
NORFOLK, VA
Plaintiff,
v.
ACTION NO.
THR ENTERPRISES,
et
2:12cvl98
INC.,
al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This
matter
Enterprises
and
Alternatively
Action
2012.
E.
comes
before
Hanover
Require
(ECF Nos.
5,
Insurance
More
6,
the
court
the
Company,
Definite
and 7),
on
defendants',
Motion
Statement
to
Dismiss
and/or
filed by the defendants,
THR
Stay
or
the
on May 15,
The matter was referred to United States Magistrate Douglas
Miller by Order of
28 U.S.C.
ยง
June
636 (b) (1MB)
6,
2012,
Federal
pursuant
Rule of
to the provisions
Civil
Procedure
of
72(b).
The United States Magistrate Judge conducted a hearing on June
25,
2012.
The
Magistrate
filed on July 18,
2012.
Judge's
Report
and
meruit
the
claim
defendants'
defendants'
contract
and
claim
as
plaintiff's
Motion
was
The Magistrate Judge recommended that the
court grant in part and deny in part defendants'
allowing
Recommendation
for
Motion to Stay.
More
Motion to Dismiss,
pled,
but
dismissing
claim
for
attorney's
Definite
Statement;
the
quantum
fees;
deny
and
deny
By copy of
advised
August
of
6,
the
their
2012,
Report
right
the
to
and Recommendation,
file
court
written
objections
received defendants'
Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.
the court received Plaintiff's
The
court,
Recommendation
thereto,
does
having
and
having
were
thereto.
On
Objection to
On August 23,
the
2012,
Response.
examined the
made
hereby adopt
recommendations
the parties
objection
de
novo
and approve
to
the Report
findings
in
full
with
the
and
respect
findings
and
set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the
United States Magistrate Judge filed July 18,
2012.
Accordingly,
the court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART defendants'
Motion to
Dismiss
pled,
but
claim
for
(ECF
dismissing
the
attorney's
Statement
No.
No.
5),
allowing
quantum
fees;
(ECF No.
meruit
DENIES
6);
the
contract
claim,
defendants'
and
claim
as
plaintiff's
Motion
and DENIES defendants'
for
More
Definite
Motion to Stay
(ECF
7).
The Clerk
shall
forward a copy of
this
Order to counsel
for
the parties.
It
is
so ORDERED.
/_/
Rebecca Beach Smith
United States District Judge
REBECCA BEACH
CHIEF UNITED
Norfolk,
August
Virginia
o\*i ,
2012
SMITH
STATES
DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?