Ofori v. Director of VA Department of Corrections
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 15 Report and Recommendations, 10 Motion to Dismiss filed by Harold W. Clarke. The court, having reviewed the record and examined the objections filed by petitioner to the Report and Recommendation, and having made de novo findings with respect to the portions objected to, does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation filed November 9, 2012. It is, therefore, ORDERED that Respondent's Motion to Dismiss be GRANTED and the Petitioner's petition be DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. Signed by District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith and filed on 12/20/2012; copies distributed on 12/21/2012. (bnew)
UNITED
FOR
THE
STATES
DISTRICT
EASTERN DISTRICT
OF
FILED
COURT
VIRGINIA
DEC 2 0 2012
Norfolk Division
CLERK, US DISTRICT COURT
TERRY OFORI,
NORFOLK. VA
#1165768,
Petitioner,
Civil
v.
HAROLD
W.
Action No.
2:12cv290
CLARK,
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,
Respondent.
FINAL
This
corpus
matter
pursuant
was
to
28
initiated
U.S.C.
ORDER
by
petition
§ 2254.
sentence for two counts of rape,
for
While
of
serving a
habeas
30-year
Petitioner was convicted by the
Circuit Court of Fairfax County on October 26,
sentenced to one year in prison.
writ
2000 of escape and
His present petition challenges
his guilty plea and conviction.
The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
for
report
U.S.C.
and
recommendation pursuant
§ 636(b)(1)(B)
and
(C)
and
Rule
to
the
provisions
72
of
the
Rules
of
of
28
the
United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
The Report and Recommendation filed November 9, 2012
dismissal of the petition.
recommends
Each party was advised of his right to
file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by
the Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner's
On November 30, 2012, the court received
Objections
to
the
Report
and
Recommendation.
The
Respondent filed no response to the objections and the time for
responding has now expired.
The
court,
having
reviewed
the
record
and
examined
the
objections filed by petitioner to the Report and Recommendation,
and having made
objected
to,
de novo findings with respect
does
hereby
adopt
and
approve
to the portions
the
findings
and
recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation filed
November
Motion
9,
to
2012.
It
is,
therefore,
Dismiss
be
GRANTED
and
ORDERED
the
that
Respondent's
Petitioner's
petition be
DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice.
Petitioner is hereby notified that he may appeal from the
judgment entered pursuant to this Final Order by filing a written
notice
of appeal
Courthouse,
with
the
Clerk of
600 Granby Street,
this
Norfolk,
court,
United States
Virginia 23510,
within
thirty (30) days from the date of entry of such judgment.
Petitioner has failed to demonstrate "a substantial showing of
the
denial
of
a
constitutional
right,"
therefore,
the
court
declines to issue any certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule
22(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
v. Cockrell,
123 S.Ct.
1029,
1039 (2003).
See Miller-El
The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Final Order to Petitioner
and counsel of record for Respondent.
_&=
Hfiebecca Beach Smith
:a&™!^ -£&-
CHIEF UNITED STATES
Norfolk, Virginia
fc>ecgjt*vVeft 2l0 , 2012
DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?