Harrell Shellman v. Social Security Administration
Filing
18
FINAL ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss; adopting Report and Recommendations re 14 as amended. The Court AMENDS the Report and Recommendation only to the extent it recommended construing Defendant's motion as a Rule 12(b)(1) motion and reli ed in part on the declaration attached to Defendant's motion to dismiss.* (See footnotes in Order) Instead, the Court considers such motion under Rule 12(b)(6). With that small caveat, the Court adopts the remainder of the Report and Recommendat ion. Plaintiff's action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Parties are advised that they may appeal this Final Order within 60 days of the date of this Order. Copies forwarded as directed. Signed by District Judge Mark S. Davis on 02/18/2015. (epri)
P
p
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
k
1
CLERK, U.S. DiSlHiul L.uutti
NORFOLK. VA
SHELLMAN,
Plaintiff,
ACTION NO.
V.
CAROLYN W.
2:14cv382
COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner,
Social Security Administration,
Defendant.
FINAL
The
pro
se
Plaintiff,
ORDER
Lisa
EveCte
Harrell
Shellman
("Plaintiff" ) , brought this action under Section 205 (g) of the Social
SecurityAct, 42U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of the final
decision
of
the
Administration
Acting
denying
Commissioner
Plaintiff's
of
the
Social
applications
for
Security
disability
insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income under the Social
Security Act.
This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge,
pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C.
Rule 72(b)
District
§ 636(b)(1)(B)
of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
72 of the Rules of
of
and (C)
and
as well as Rule
the United States D i s t r i c t Court for the Eastern
Virginia.
The
Report
and
Hi
FEB 1 8 2015
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division.
LISA EVETTE HARRELL
r-N
Recommendation
of
the
Magistrate Judge was filed on December 30, 2014, recommending that
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?