Henson v. Colvin
Filing
17
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; granting in part and denying in part 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 13 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 16 Report and Recommendations. The Acting Commissioner's final decision is VACATED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Court's Order. Signed by District Judge Henry C. Morgan, Jr., on 1/16/18. (bpet)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division
DEBORAH HENSON,
FILED
JAN 1 6 2018
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
NORFOLK. VA
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.: 2:16cv587
V.
NANCY A. BERRYHILL,
Acting Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
Plaintiff Deborah Henson ("Plaintiff or "Henson") brought this action under 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g) seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Acting Commissioner of the Social
Security Administration ("Acting Commissioner") denying her claim for Disability Insurance
Benefits ("DIB") pursuant to Title II of the Social Security Act. Pursuant to the provisions of 28
U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), Rule 72(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 72 of
the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, and by
order of reference dated December 28. 2016, this matter was referred to a United States
Magistrate Judge for a Report and Recommendation. Doc. 9.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge ("R&R"), filed on December
1, 2017, found that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") failed to reconcile discrepancies
between his determination of Henson's residual functional capacity ("RFC") and the medical
opinion evidence in the record. Doc. 16 at 13-18. The R&R also found that the ALJ complied
with the Appeals Council's remand order. Id at 18-20. Accordingly, the Magistrate Judge
recommended that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 11, be GRANTED IN PART
AND DENIED IN PART, that the Acting Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment,
Doc. 13, be DENIED, and that the final decision of the Acting Commissioner be VACATED and
REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the R&R.
By copy of the R&R, each party was advised of the right to file written objections to the
findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge within fourteen (14) days fi-om the
date the R&R was sent, pursuant to Rule 6(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Doc. 16 at
20-21.
The time for filing written objections has now passed, and neither party has filed
objections. As indicated in the R&R, failure to file timely objections to the findings and
recommendations set forth in the R&R "will result in waiver of right to appeal fi-om a judgment
of this Court based on such findings and recommendations." Id. at 21.
This Court has reviewed the R&R of the Magistrate Judge and hereby adopts and
approves in full the findings and recommendations set forth therein. Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Acting Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 13, is
DENIED, that Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. 11, is GRANTED IN PART
and DENIED IN PART, and that the Acting Commissioner's final decision is VACATED and
REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with this Court's Order.
Plaintiff is advised that she may appeal from this Order by forwarding a written notice of
appeal to the Clerk of the United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby
Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510. Said written notice must be received by the Clerk within sixty
(60) days from the date of this Order. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal,
Plaintiff must submit the application to proceed in forma pauperis to the Clerk, United States
Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit, 1100 E. Main Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219.
The Clerk is REQUESTED to send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.
It is so ORDERED.
/s^_
Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.
Senior United States District Judy:e
HENRY COKE MORGAN,
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Norfolk, Virgima_
January
fzO18
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?