Copeland v. Clarke
Filing
24
FINAL ORDER. 15 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED, and the 1 Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED with prejudice. It is ORDERED that Judgment be entered in favor of Respondent. Signed by District Judge Arenda L. Wright Allen on 9/24/2018. Copies mailed 9/24/2018. (jmey, )
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division
SENTRELL LEVERT COPELAND, #1416753,
Petitioner,
V.
ACTION NO.
2:17cv93
HAROLD W. CLARKE,
Director, Virginia Department of Corrections,
Respondent.
FINAL ORDER
Petitioner Sentrell Levert Copeland, a Virginia inmate, filed a pro se petition pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 2254 alleging that his federal rights were violated resulting in an involuntary plea of
guilty to malicious wounding. ECF No. 1. On October 3, 2011, Copeland was sentenced in the
Circuit Court for the City of Norfolk to serve ten years for the malicious wounding conviction and
three years for the resulting probation violation.
The petition was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge for a report and
recommendation pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Civil
Rule 72 of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. The
Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 23) proposes that Respondent's
Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15) be granted, and that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus be
denied and dismissed with prejudice. The Court has received no objections to the Report and
Recommendation, and the time for filing objections has expired.
The Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report and
Recommendation filed July 3, 2018.
Respondent's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 15) is
GRANTED, and the petition for a wrh of habeas corpus is denied and dismissed with prejudice.
It is ORDERED that Judgment be entered in favor of Respondent.
Petitioner may appeal from the Judgment entered pursuant to this Final Order by filing a
Notice of Appeal with the Clerk of this Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street,
Norfolk, Virginia 23510, within thirty days from the date of entry of such Judgment.
Petitioner has failed to demonstrate "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right," and the Court declines to issue any certificate of appealability pursuantto Rule 22(b) of the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003).
The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Final Order to Petitioner and to counsel of record for
Respondent.
nida L. Wright Allen
United States District Judge
Norfolk, Virginia
,
2018
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?