Virginia International Terminals, LLC v. Keystone Transportation Solutions, LLC
Filing
23
ORDER: the Court does hereby ADOPT AND APPROVE IN FULL the 22 Report and Recommendations. VIT's 10 Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART; the Court GRANTS VIT's request for damages, and DENIES VIT's req uest for attorneys' fees and costs. The court ORDERS declaratory relief as outlined in the Order. VIT shall submit a final interest calculation within 7 days from the entry date of this Order. Signed by Chief District Judge Rebecca Beach Smith on 5/1/18. (bpet)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Norfolk Division
VIRGINIA INTERNATIONAL
TERMINALS, LLC,
Plaintiff,
Case No.
V.
2:17cv537
KEYSTONE TRANSPORTATION
SOLUTIONS, LLC,
Defendant.
ORDER
This matter comes before the court on Plaintiff's,
Virginia
International Terminals, LLC (^'VIT") / Motion for Default Judgment
(ECF No.
10) filed on December 12, 2017.
The matter was referred
to a United States Magistrate Judge by Order of January 2, 2018, (ECF
No. 11), pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) (1) (B) and
(C), and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), to conduct hearings,
including evidentiary hearings, if necessary, and to submit to the
undersigned
proposed
findings
of
fact,
if
applicable,
and
recommendations for the disposition of the motion.
The United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation
(ECF No.
22)
was filed on April 5,
2018.
The Magistrate Judge
recommended that the court grant in part and deny in part VIT's Motion
for Default Judgment.
By copy of the Report and Recommendation of
the Magistrate Judge, the parties were advised of their right to file
written objections thereto.
The court has received no objections
to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the time
for filing same has expired.
The court does hereby ADOPT AND APPROVE IN EtJLL the findings
and recommendations set forth in the Report and Recommendation of
the
United
States
Magistrate
Judge
filed
April
5,
2018.
Accordingly, VIT's Motion for Default Judgment is GRANTED IN PART
AND DENIED IN PART.
Specifically, the court GRANTS VIT's request
for damages, except for the two invoices from March 2015 and the
interest associated with those invoices.
This damages award totals
to a sum of $129,656.84, which includes $121,586.99 for unpaid rent,
$3,655.00 for Defendant's, Keystone Transportation Solutions, LLC
(«Kts") containers, and $4,414.85 for unpaid rail charges, plus
applicable interest.
No later than seven days from the entry date
of this Order, VIT shall submit a final interest calculation to the
court, which interest shall be calculated at the annual rate of twelve
percent (12%) on each of the three recoverable items detailed above.
Moreover,
the
interest
for
each
recoverable
invoice
on
each
recoverable item is to be calculated separately from the due date
displayed on the invoice to the entry date of this Order.
The court DENIES VIT's request for attorneys' fees and costs.
Further, the court ORDERS the following declaratory relief:
(1) KTS shall indemnify and hold VIT harmless from any claims,
except those caused by the negligence or intentional misconduct of
VIT, that may be brought against VIT by Teak or its principals that
are in any way
related to,
connected with,
or arise from the
agreement;
(2)
KTS shall provide insurance, or otherwise serve as the
insurer of last resort, for any claims that may be brought against
VIT by Teak that are related to, connected with, or arise from the
agreement;
(3)
The assignment of any claims by KTS to Teak that are related
to, connected with, or arise from the agreement is null and void;
and
(4)
The assignment of any tort claims by KTS to Teak that do
not arise from a direct injury to real or personal property is null
and void.
The Clerk shall forward a copy of this Order to all parties of
record.
It is
so ORDERED
Is/
Rebecca Beach Smith
Chief Judge
REBECCA BEACH SMITH
CHIEF
May \ , 2018
JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?