segOne, Inc. v. Fox Broadcasting Company

Filing 27

CERTIFICATE of Service re 26 Memorandum in Support by James Gibson on behalf of segOne, Inc. (Gibson, James)

Download PDF
segOne, Inc. v. Fox Broadcasting Company Doc. 27 Case 3:07-cv-00342-JRS Document 27 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 1 of 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA RICHMOND DIVISION SEGONE, INC., Plaintiff, v. FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY, Defendant. Civil Action No. 3:07cv342-JRS SUPPLEMENTAL CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on the 13th day of September, 2007, I electronically filed a Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, along with accompanying exhibits, with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which then sent a notification of such filing (NEF) to the following attorneys: Robert M. Tyler, Esq. McGuire Woods LLP One James Center 901 East Cary Street Richmond, Virginia 23219 rtyler@mcguirewoods.com Paul B. Gaffney, Esq. Williams & Connolly LLP 725 Twelfth Street NW Washington, DC 20005 pgaffney@wc.com I further certify that on the 14th day of September, 2007, I electronically filed the same Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, along with the same accompanying exhibits, with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which then sent a notification of such filing (NEF) to the attorneys listed above. The second filing was in response to a request from the Clerk of Court that the Memorandum and accompanying exhibits be filed as their own separate docket entry rather than under the docket number assigned to the Motion for Summary Judgment. Dockets.Justia.com Case 3:07-cv-00342-JRS Document 27 Filed 09/17/2007 Page 2 of 2 /s/ James Gibson Virginia Bar No. 41469 Attorney for segOne, Inc. JAMES GIBSON PLLC University of Virginia School of Law 580 Massie Road Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-1789 (434) 924-6454 phone (434) 924-7536 fax jgibson@richmond.edu Dated: September 17, 2007 Supplemental Certificate Of Service -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?