Barnes v. Braxton
Filing
31
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 7/25/11. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
JERRY LAMONT BARNES,
)
)
Petitioner,
)
)
v.
)
DANIEL A. BRAXTON,
Respondent.
Civil Action No. 3:08CV840
)
)
)
)
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Denying Certificate of Appealability)
Jerry Lamont Barnes ("Barnes"), a Virginia prisoner proceeding pro se and in
forma pauperis, filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
On October 19, 2009, the Court granted Respondent's motion to dismiss and dismissed
Petitioner's action. The Court did not issue or deny a certificate of appealability.
Petitioner appealed the Court's decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit remanded to this Court "for the limited purpose
of... supplementing] the record with an order granting or denying a certificate of
appealability." Barnes v. Braxton, No. 11-6905, at 2 (4th Cir. July 20, 2011).
An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a
judge issues a certificate of appealability ("COA"). 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(l)(A). A COA
will not issue unless a prisoner makes "a substantial showing of the denial of a
constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). This requirement is satisfied only when
"reasonable jurists could debate whether (or, for that matter, agree that) the petition
should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were
'adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further.'" Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S.
473, 484 (2000) (quoting Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 893 n.4 (1983)). No law or
evidence suggests that Petitioner is entitled to further consideration in this matter. A
certificate of appealability will therefore be denied.
An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
to
/si
Henry E. Hudson
Date: XL a.^ ZO*t
Richmond, Virginia
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?