Central Telephone Company of Virginia et al v. Sprint Communications Company of Virginia, Inc. et al
Filing 169
Memorandum Opinion: Centurylink's Objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation (Docket No. 43) are sustained and the defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies, or Alternatively, to Stay this Case under the Doctrine of Primary Jurisdiction (Docket No. 9) is DENIED; and the Motion for Leave to Supplement the Appendix to Centurylink's Opposition to Sprint's Motion to Dismiss or Stay (Docket No. 20) is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 1/3/2011. (lhin)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
