Stokes v. Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Corrections

Filing 56

ORDER granting 47 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 49 Motion to Continue Complaint; adopting Report and Recommendations re 53 Report and Recommendations; 54 Response is overruled. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and this action is closed. See Order for complete details. This Order may be appealed by the Plaintiff. Any appeal from this decision must be taken by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a timely notice of appeal may result in the loss of the right to appeal. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 9/24/12. Copy sent: Yes to Plaintiff and counsel of record. (tdai, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MILLIS STOKES, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:10cv370 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Defendant. ORDER By Order DEFENDANTS' entered MOTION herein FOR on SUMMARY December JUDGMENT 8, 2011 {Docket the No. pending 47) and PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUPPORT THE CONTINUED COMPLAINT AGAINST THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA {Docket No. 49) were referred to Magistrate Judge M. Hannah Lauck for report and recommendation. Having reviewed the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (Docket PLAINTIFF'S No. MOTION 53) IN entered herein RESPONSE TO THE on August REPORT AND ISSUED BY U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE M. HANNAH LUACK, 17, 2012, the RECOMMENDAITON DATED AUGUST 17, 2012, TO SUPPORT THE CONTINUED COMPLAINT AGAINST THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEFENDANT'S DEPARTMENT REPLY TO OF CORRECTIONS PLAINTIFF'S {Docket No. RESPONSE/OBJECTIONS 54), the TO THE MAGISTRATES [sic] REPORT AND RECOMMENDAITON (Docket No. 55), and having considered the record and the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION and finding no error therein, it is hereby ORDERED that: (1) The PLAINTIFF'S MOTION IN RESPONSE TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDAITON ISSUED BY U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE M. HANNAH LAUCK, DATED AUGUST 17, 2012, TO SUPPORT THE CONTINUED COMPLAINT AGAINST THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS (Docket No. 54), is overruled; (2) The REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 53) is ADOPTED on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; (3) The DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 47) is granted; (4) The PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SUPPORT THE CONTINUED COMPLAINT AGAINST THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA (Docket No. 49) is denied; and (5) The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice and this action is closed. The issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process. This Order may be appealed by the plaintiff] . Any appeal from this decision must be taken by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the Court within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof. Failure to file a timely notice of appeal may result in the loss of the right to appeal. It is so ORDERED. /s/ Robert E. Payne fisf Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Virginia Date: September >^, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?