Gelardos v. Ohai et al
Filing
22
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 12/12/11. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )
IN THE UNITED
FOR THE
STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
MARINOS N.
GELARDOS,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No.
PAUL OHAI,
3:10CV779
et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Marinos N. Gelardos,
in
forma
pauperis,
allegations
in
a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se and
filed
this
Gelardos's
42
U.S.C.
complaint
§
1983
failed
action.
to
The
provide
each
defendant with fair notice of the facts and legal basis upon which
his or her liability rests.
U.S.
544,
(1957));
555
(2007)
Potter
v.
See Bell Atl.
Corp.
(quoting Conley v. Gibson,
Clark,
497
F.2d
1206,
1207
v. Twombly,
355 U.S.
(7th
41,
Cir.
550
47
1974)
("Where a complaint alleges no specific act or conduct on the part
of the defendant and the complaint is silent as to the defendant
except for his name appearing in the caption,
the
complaint
is
properly dismissed, even under the liberal construction to be given
pro se complaints."
(citing Brzozowski v.
306,
1968))).
312
(E.D.
Pa.
entered on September 15,
Accordingly,
Randall,
281 F.
Supp.
by Memorandum Order
2011, the Court directed Gelardos, within
twenty-one (21) days of the date of entry thereof, to particularize
his complaint in conformance with the Court's instructions.
The
Court
warned
Gelardos
that
the
failure
to
comply
with
the
directives of the September 15, 2011 Memorandum Order would result
in the dismissal of the action.
See Fed.
R.
Civ.
P.
41(b).
More than twenty-one (21) days have elapsed since the entry of
the
September
responded.
15,
2011
Memorandum
Order
and
Gelardos
has
not
Such actions demonstrate a wilful failure to prosecute.
Accordingly,
the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of the Memorandum Opinion
to Gelardos.
It
is so ORDERED.
Is/
Jl£l_
Robert E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Richmond, Virginia
Date:_4Lcc**-*£*^&y W'
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?