Tippens v. Center for Therapeutic Justice et al

Filing 32

FINAL ORDER denying 17 Motion for Summary Judgment; accepting and adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's objections are OVERRULED. Claim 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. CLAIM 2 is DISMISSED WITHOUT P REJUDICE. The action is DISMISSED and the Clerk is DIRECTED to note the disposition of the action for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff may appeal the decision ofthe Court. Failure to file a written notice of appeal within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof may result in the loss of the right to appeal. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 3/8/12. Copy sent: Yes (tdai, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division ROBERT EARL TIPPENS, JR. Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 3:11CV71-HEH v. CENTER FOR THERAPEUTIC JUSTICE, etal, Defendants. FINAL ORDER (Adopting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing § 1983 Action) In accordance with the accompanying Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: Plaintiffs objections are OVERRULED; the Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; Claim 1 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; CLAIM 2 is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment (Dk. No. 17) is DENIED; the action is DISMISSED; and the Clerk is DIRECTED to note the disposition of the action for the purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff may appeal the decision of the Court. Failure to file a written notice of appeal within thirty (30) days of the date of entry hereof may result in the loss of the right to appeal. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send the Memorandum Opinion and Order to Plaintiff. And it is so ORDERED. m. Isl HENRY E.HUDSON Date <BWftg*n~ Richmond, Virginia UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?