Murphy v. Astrue
Filing
16
FINAL ORDER denying 8 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 9 Motion to Remand; granting 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 13 Report and Recommendations. The Commissioner's decision denying benefi ts to Murphy is AFFIRMED. It is further ORDERED that the issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 8/20/13. (tdai, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
REBECCA W. MURPHY
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No. 3:1 l-cv-702-JAG
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner ofSocial Security,
Defendant.
FINAL ORDER
THIS MATTER is before the Court on the plaintiff Rebecca W. Murphy's Objections
(Dk. No. 14) to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations. (Dk. No. 13). Having
reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendations, the defendant's response to the
plaintiffs objections (Dk. No. 15), and the record, and finding no error therein, it is hereby
ordered that:
(1) The plaintiffs Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the MagistrateJudge
are OVERRULED;
(2) The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Dk. No. 13) is ADOPTED
on the basis of the reasoning of the Reportand Recommendation;
(3) The plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment, or in the Alternative, Motion for
Remand (Dk. Nos. 8 and 9) is DENIED;
(4) The Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment (Dk. No. 11) is GRANTED;
and
(5) The Commissioner's decision denying benefits to Murphy is AFFIRMED.
It is further ORDERED that the issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral
argument would not materially aid the decisional process.
It is so ORDERED.
Let the Clerk send a copy of this Order to all counsel of record.
/s/
John A. Gibney, J#
United States Dimicl Judge
Date: August 20. 2013
Richmond, VA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?