Winston v. United States et al

Filing 55

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 1/27/14. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MONTE DECARLOS WINSTON v. Civil No. 3:11CV812 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered September 10, 2013, the Court dismissed Monte DeCarlos Winston's complaint pursuant to the Federal 2671-2689, § 1331. Torts with Claim Act jurisdiction ("FTCA") , 28 vested U.S.C. pursuant to §§ 28 1346, U.S.C. On September 18, 2013 the Court received from Winston a "Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(a) Motion," ECF No. wishes to 60(b), "he must 54 pursue and (b) of F.R.Civ.P." (capitalization relief under identify the corrected).) Federal specific Rule of ("Rule 60 If Civil subsection Winston Procedure of the rule that governs his motion and brief why he is entitled to relief under that No. 3:07cv319, portion of Rule 2011 WL 2470119, (citation omitted) 60(b). Shanklin at *1 (E.D. Va. v. June 21, (internal quotation marks omitted). Seals, 2011) To the extent Winston brings a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(a), he fails to identify "a clerical mistake or a mistake arising from oversight or omission . . . in a judgment, order, or other part of the record." Accordingly, Winston's Rule 60 Fed. Motion R. Civ. (ECF No. P. 54) 60(a).1 will be denied without prejudice. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Memorandum Opinion to Winston and counsel for the United States. $U£_ 1st j/*b/U*-C4^ ^lY^££>( y> Senior united States District Judge Date: Richmond, Virginia 1 In support of his Rule 60(a) Motion, Winston suggests that the "Civil Action No. was entered under a Criminal Action No." and that "Consent by both parties was given to Magistrate Judge M. Hannah incorrect. action Lauck . . . ." (Rule 60 The Memorandum Opinion clearly assigns the action the Mot. 1.) Winston and Order dismissing civil number is the "3:11CV812" and only Winston consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. (See ECF No. 5.) 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?