Winston v. United States et al
Filing
55
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 1/27/14. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
MONTE
DECARLOS
WINSTON
v.
Civil No.
3:11CV812
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By Memorandum Opinion and Order entered September 10, 2013,
the Court dismissed Monte DeCarlos Winston's complaint pursuant
to
the
Federal
2671-2689,
§ 1331.
Torts
with
Claim Act
jurisdiction
("FTCA") , 28
vested
U.S.C.
pursuant
to
§§
28
1346,
U.S.C.
On September 18, 2013 the Court received from Winston a
"Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(a)
Motion,"
ECF
No.
wishes
to
60(b),
"he must
54
pursue
and (b) of F.R.Civ.P."
(capitalization
relief
under
identify the
corrected).)
Federal
specific
Rule
of
("Rule 60
If
Civil
subsection
Winston
Procedure
of the
rule
that governs his motion and brief why he is entitled to relief
under
that
No. 3:07cv319,
portion
of
Rule
2011 WL 2470119,
(citation omitted)
60(b).
Shanklin
at *1 (E.D. Va.
v.
June 21,
(internal quotation marks omitted).
Seals,
2011)
To the
extent Winston brings a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure
60(a), he fails
to identify "a clerical mistake or a
mistake arising from oversight or omission . . . in a judgment,
order, or other part of the record."
Accordingly,
Winston's
Rule
60
Fed.
Motion
R. Civ.
(ECF
No.
P.
54)
60(a).1
will
be
denied without prejudice.
The
Clerk
is
directed
to
send
a
copy
of
this
Memorandum
Opinion to Winston and counsel for the United States.
$U£_
1st
j/*b/U*-C4^ ^lY^££>( y> Senior united States District Judge
Date:
Richmond, Virginia
1 In support of his Rule 60(a) Motion, Winston suggests that
the
"Civil Action No.
was
entered under a
Criminal Action No."
and that "Consent by both parties was given to Magistrate Judge
M.
Hannah
incorrect.
action
Lauck
.
.
.
."
(Rule
60
The Memorandum Opinion
clearly assigns
the
action the
Mot.
1.)
Winston
and Order dismissing
civil
number
is
the
"3:11CV812"
and only Winston consented to the jurisdiction of the Magistrate
Judge.
(See ECF No.
5.)
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?