Ingram v. Vereen et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/9/12. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division KEVIN D. INGRAM, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:12CV52 D.VEREEN,e/a/., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION By Memorandum Order entered on February 14, 2012, the Court conditionally docketed Plaintiffs civil action and warned Plaintiffthat he must keep the Court informed of his current address. By Memorandum Order entered on August 20, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff in forma pauperis status and filed the action. On October 1, 2012, the United States Postal Service returned the August 20, 2012 Memorandum Order to the Court marked "RETURN TO SENDER[J NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED[J UNABLE TO FORWARD." The envelope also shows that the Postal Service unsuccessfully attempted to forward the Memorandum Order to an address in Roanoke, Virginia before returning the Memorandum Order to the Court. Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion. W^ E. Hudson Henry /s/ Date: ^"^-2 "v Richmond, Virginia United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?