Ingram v. Vereen et al
Filing
17
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/9/12. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
KEVIN D. INGRAM,
Plaintiff,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:12CV52
D.VEREEN,e/a/.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
By Memorandum Order entered on February 14, 2012, the Court conditionally docketed
Plaintiffs civil action and warned Plaintiffthat he must keep the Court informed of his current
address. By Memorandum Order entered on August 20, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff in
forma pauperis status and filed the action. On October 1, 2012, the United States Postal Service
returned the August 20, 2012 Memorandum Order to the Court marked "RETURN TO
SENDER[J NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED[J UNABLE TO FORWARD." The
envelope also shows that the Postal Service unsuccessfully attempted to forward the
Memorandum Order to an address in Roanoke, Virginia before returning the Memorandum
Order to the Court. Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs
failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in
prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
W^ E. Hudson
Henry
/s/
Date: ^"^-2 "v
Richmond, Virginia
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?