Ingram v. Vereen et al

Filing 17

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 11/9/12. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division

KEVIN D. INGRAM,

Plaintiff,
v.

Civil Action No. 3:12CV52

D.VEREEN,e/a/.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION

By Memorandum Order entered on February 14, 2012, the Court conditionally docketed

Plaintiffs civil action and warned Plaintiffthat he must keep the Court informed of his current
address. By Memorandum Order entered on August 20, 2012, the Court granted Plaintiff in

forma pauperis status and filed the action. On October 1, 2012, the United States Postal Service
returned the August 20, 2012 Memorandum Order to the Court marked "RETURN TO
SENDER[J NOT DELIVERABLE AS ADDRESSED[J UNABLE TO FORWARD." The

envelope also shows that the Postal Service unsuccessfully attempted to forward the
Memorandum Order to an address in Roanoke, Virginia before returning the Memorandum

Order to the Court. Plaintiff has not contacted the Court to provide a current address. Plaintiffs
failure to contact the Court and provide a current address indicates his lack of interest in

prosecuting this action. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Accordingly, the action will be DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

An appropriate Order shall accompany this Memorandum Opinion.

W^ E. Hudson
Henry

/s/

Date: ^"^-2 "v
Richmond, Virginia

United States District Judge