Hearn v. Unknown

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge John A. Gibney, Jr on 11/19/12. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division MICHAEL HENRY HEARN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 3:12CV517 UNKNOWN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, a Mississippi inmate, submitted this action and requested leave to proceed in formapauperis. The pertinent statute provides: In no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action [informa pauperis] if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(g). Plaintiffhas at least three other actions or appeals that have been dismissed as frivolous or for failure to state a claim. See, e.g., Hearn v. Warden, No. 4:05cvl8TSL-AGN, 3 n.2 (S.D. Miss. Jan. 28, 2005) (citing cases). Plaintiffs current pleading does not suggest that Plaintiff is in imminent danger of serious physical harm. By Memorandum Order entered on July 25, 2012, this Court denied Plaintiffs requestto proceed in forma pauperis and ordered him to submit the full filing fee within eleven (11) days of the date of entry thereof. Plaintiff failed to respond to the July 25, 2012 Memorandum Order. Accordingly, this action will be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). An appropriate Order shall issue. Date: \\j\l\\**Richmond, Virginia /s/ John A. Glbney^rJ /' " United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?