Brooks v. Wilson
Filing
16
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 08/13/2014. Copy mailed to Petitioner. (walk, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
L
IR\
AUG I 4 2014
B
E
Richmond Division
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND, VA
CHARLES BROOKS,
Petitioner,
Civil Action No. 3:12CV853-HEH
v.
ERIC D. WILSON,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Denying 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition)
Charles Brooks, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a 28 U.S.C. § 2241
petition. (ECF No. 6.) Brooks contends that the United States Parole Commission
("Commission") erred in executing his sentence. Specifically, Brooks raises the
following grounds for relief:
Claim 1
When the Commission revoked Brooks's parole in 2011, it violated
Brooks's rights by failing to properly credit the 47 months Brooks
served on a North Carolina sentence against Brooks's D.C.
Sentence.
Claim 2
"Illegal sentence." (§ 2241 Pet. Attach. 1.) Upon revoking Brooks's
Parole is 2011, the Commission required Brooks to serve 162
months prior to considering Brooks for parole. Brooks asserts, "I
don't have 162 mos. sentence for the [Commission] to give me ...."
(Id)
Claim 3
The Commission utilized an "[u]nlawful regulation." (Id. at 2.)
Respondent has filed a Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 10.) Brooks has
responded. (ECF No. 14.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the
Motion for Summary Judgment.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?