Jones v. Astrue

Filing 21

ORDER denying 9 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 11 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 17 Report and Recommendations; 18 Objections to the Report and Recommendation are overruled; the Commissioner's decision is affirmed; It is further ORDERED that the issues are adequately addressedby the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 3/4/14. (kyou, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA

1—L_i

Richmond Division

MAR -4 2014
GAIL S.

CLcS<;"j t. district court

JONES,

filCHMQND.VA

Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.

v.

CAROLYN W.

3:12v909

COLVIN,

Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER

Having reviewed the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate

Judge entered herein on January 23, 2014 (Docket No. 17), the
PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (Docket No. 18),
the DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO THE REPORT AND

RECOMMENDATION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DAVID J. NOVAK (Docket No. 19),

and having considered the record and the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
and finding no error therein, it is hereby ORDERED that:
(1)

The PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

(Docket No. 18) are overruled;

(2)

The REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge

(Docket No. 17) is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT
AND

RECOMMENDATION;

(3) The plaintiff's MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 9)
is denied;

t.

(4} The defendant's MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Docket No. 11)
is granted;

and

(5) The Commissioner's decision is affirmed.
It is further ORDERED that the issues are adequately addressed

by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the
decisional process.
It

is

so ORDERED.

Robert E.

/s/
Payne

(ite

Senior United States District Judge

Richmond, Virginia
Date: February ., , 2014