Walters v. Astrue
Filing
17
ORDER that: (1) The Plaintiff's 15 Objections to Magistrate's Report and Recommendation are overruled; (2) The 14 Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the Report and Recommendatio n; (3) The Plaintiff's 10 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; (4) The Defendant's 12 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted; and (5) The Commissioner's decision is affirmed. It is further ORDERED that the issues are adequately addressed by the briefs and oral argument would not materially aid the decisional process. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 01/31/2014. (walk, )
IN THE UNITED
FOR THE
STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
1
Richmond Division
I
L
E
m
- 3 2014
CLERK, U.S. L.S. filCT COURT
RICHMOND, VA
ROSEMARY WALTERS,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action
CAROLYN W.
No.
3:13cv33
COLVIN,
Acting Commissioner of
Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
Having reviewed the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate
Judge
entered
PLAINTIFF'S
(Docket No.
herein
OBJECTIONS
on
TO
January
6,
2014
MAGISTRATE'S
(Docket
REPORT
AND
No.
14),
the
RECOMMENDATION
15), the DEFENDANT'S RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS
TO THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE
JUDGE'S
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
(Docket No. 16) , and having considered the record and the REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION and finding no error therein,
it is hereby ORDERED
that:
(1)
The
RECOMMENDATION
(2)
PLAINTIFF'S
(Docket No.
OBJECTIONS
15)
TO
MAGISTRATE'S
REPORT
AND
are overruled;
The REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION of the Magistrate Judge
(Docket No. 14) is adopted on the basis of the reasoning of the REPORT
AND RECOMMENDATION;
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?