Boyd v. Johnson
Filing
4
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by District Judge Henry E. Hudson on 9/23/13. Copy sent: Yes(tdai, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
ARNEZ BOYD,
Petitioner,
Civil Action No. 3:13CV177-HEH
GENE M. JOHNSON,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing Action Without Prejudice)
Petitioner, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se9 submitted a motion to this Court
requesting that the Court appoint counsel to assist him in preparing and filing a 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254 petition. By Memorandum Order entered on August 8, 2013, the Court denied
Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. The Court further informed Petitioner
that if he wished to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, he must file a petition for a
writ of habeas corpus on the proper forms. The Court mailed the standardized forms for
filing a § 2254 petition to Petitioner. The Court warned Petitioner that if he failed to
return the completed § 2254 forms within twenty (20) days of the date of entry thereof,
the Court would dismiss the action without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). More
than twenty (20) days have elapsed and Petitioner has not returned the completed forms.
Accordingly, the action will be dismissed without prejudice.
An appropriate Order shall issue.
%M
/s/
HENRY E. HUDSON
Date:Scft zzvoll
Richmond, Virginia
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?