Fariasantos v. Rosenberg & Associates, LLC
Filing
103
MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/27/2015. (walk, )
IN THE UNITED
STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
I
E
CLAUDIO FARIASANTOS,
ft
FEB 2 7 2015
on behalf of himself and all
M
others similarly situated,
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND, VA
Plaintiff,
Civil Action No.
v.
ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES,
3:13cv543
LLC,
Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This
matter
ASSOCIATES,
COMPLAINT
LLC'S
FOR
ALTERNATIVE,
No.
66)
PARTIAL
and
PURSUANT
RULE
the
reasons
OF
the
TO
SUMMARY
DIANE
forth
on
JUDGMENT
AND
AND
RULE
below,
ROSENBERG
CLASS
JURISDICTION
REGARDING
OBJECTION
AND
DEFENDANT
PLAINTIFF'S
MATTER
ROSENBERG
56(c)(4)
set
Court
DISMISS
SUBJECT
PLAINTIFF'S
OF
TO
before
MOTION
LACK
DECLARATION
For
is
EVIDENCE
37(c)(1)
Defendant's
ACTION
OR,
IN
DAMAGES
MOTION
STRIKE
NET
(Docket
motions
THE
(Docket
TO
OF
&
WORTH
No.
79).
will
be
denied and Plaintiff s motion will be granted in part and denied
in part.
BACKGROUND
This
Defendant
disclosures
case
arises
Rosenberg
in
&
alleged
from
debt-collection
Associates,
violation
of
LLC
the
letters
("R&A")
Fair
that
Debt
sent
by
include
Collections
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?