Fariasantos v. Rosenberg & Associates, LLC

Filing 103

MEMORANDUM OPINION. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/27/2015. (walk, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division I E CLAUDIO FARIASANTOS, ft FEB 2 7 2015 on behalf of himself and all M others similarly situated, CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND, VA Plaintiff, Civil Action No. v. ROSENBERG & ASSOCIATES, 3:13cv543 LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This matter ASSOCIATES, COMPLAINT LLC'S FOR ALTERNATIVE, No. 66) PARTIAL and PURSUANT RULE the reasons OF the TO SUMMARY DIANE forth on JUDGMENT AND AND RULE below, ROSENBERG CLASS JURISDICTION REGARDING OBJECTION AND DEFENDANT PLAINTIFF'S MATTER ROSENBERG 56(c)(4) set Court DISMISS SUBJECT PLAINTIFF'S OF TO before MOTION LACK DECLARATION For is EVIDENCE 37(c)(1) Defendant's ACTION OR, IN DAMAGES MOTION STRIKE NET (Docket motions THE (Docket TO OF & WORTH No. 79). will be denied and Plaintiff s motion will be granted in part and denied in part. BACKGROUND This Defendant disclosures case arises Rosenberg in & alleged from debt-collection Associates, violation of LLC the letters ("R&A") Fair that Debt sent by include Collections

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?