Hardy v. Barns
Filing
56
MEMORANDUM OPINION. See for complete details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/08/2016. Clerk mailed copy to pro se Petitioner. (nbrow)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
FEB - 9 20l6
CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT
RICHMOND, VA
KEYON SANTE HARDY,
Petitioner,
v.
Civil Action No. 3:13CV747
HAROLD CLARKE,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Keyon
Sante
Hardy,
a
Virginia
inmate
proceeding
pro
se,
filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28
U.S.C.
2254.
§
In his 28 U.S.C.
§
2254 Petition,
Hardy claimed
that he failed to receive proper credit against his sentence for
time spent in custody.
Petitioner
has
been
Since the filing of his
released
from
custody.
Memorandum Order entered on January 8,
Hardy,
within eleven (11)
show cause
moot.
why
Jarvis,
423
F.
Kemna,
App'x
2254 Petition,
Accordingly,
328,
should not
523 U.S.
328
1,
{4th
by
the Court directed
days of the date of entry thereof,
the present action
See Spencer v.
2016,
§
be
to
dismissed as
10
(1998);
Wallace v.
Cir.
2011)
(citations
omitted).
More than eleven
the
January
responded.
8,
(11)
2016
Accordingly,
days have elapsed since the entry of
Memorandum
Order
and
Hardy
has
not
the action will be dismissed as moot.
The Court will DENY a certificate of appealability.
The
Clerk
is
directed
to
send a
copy of
the
Memorandum
Opinion to Hardy and counsel for Respondent.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/
/(ff
Robert. E. Payne
Senior United States District Judge
Richmond, Virgini§
Date: February
· , 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?