Hardy v. Barns

Filing 56

MEMORANDUM OPINION. See for complete details. Signed by District Judge Robert E. Payne on 02/08/2016. Clerk mailed copy to pro se Petitioner. (nbrow)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division FEB - 9 20l6 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT RICHMOND, VA KEYON SANTE HARDY, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 3:13CV747 HAROLD CLARKE, Respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION Keyon Sante Hardy, a Virginia inmate proceeding pro se, filed this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. § In his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition, Hardy claimed that he failed to receive proper credit against his sentence for time spent in custody. Petitioner has been Since the filing of his released from custody. Memorandum Order entered on January 8, Hardy, within eleven (11) show cause moot. why Jarvis, 423 F. Kemna, App'x 2254 Petition, Accordingly, 328, should not 523 U.S. 328 1, {4th by the Court directed days of the date of entry thereof, the present action See Spencer v. 2016, § be to dismissed as 10 (1998); Wallace v. Cir. 2011) (citations omitted). More than eleven the January responded. 8, (11) 2016 Accordingly, days have elapsed since the entry of Memorandum Order and Hardy has not the action will be dismissed as moot. The Court will DENY a certificate of appealability. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of the Memorandum Opinion to Hardy and counsel for Respondent. It is so ORDERED. /s/ /(ff Robert. E. Payne Senior United States District Judge Richmond, Virgini§ Date: February · , 2016 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?